A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
A Dictionary of Cont..
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
which produces the desired effect. An effectual<br />
measure or remedy is one that does what was<br />
hoped would be done. A law is effective when<br />
it is in operation, eflectual if it accomplishes its<br />
purpose.<br />
Eficient also means producing the desired<br />
effect, but it has the added connotation, in<br />
modern usage, <strong>of</strong> doing so with a high ratio <strong>of</strong><br />
return for expenditure. It differs from eflectual<br />
in carrying this suggestion and in the fact that it<br />
is applied to persons as well as to things (An<br />
eficient secretary is an eflectual agent for one<br />
who would make his will effective).<br />
Eficacious suggests the capability <strong>of</strong> achieving<br />
a certain end, a capability <strong>of</strong>ten manifested<br />
only when actually employed (an efficacious<br />
drug in the cure <strong>of</strong> these infections). It, too, is<br />
applied only to things, not to persons. See also<br />
affect.<br />
effeminate. See female.<br />
effete is a literary word for exhausted, worn out,<br />
applied to something or someone no longer<br />
creative (an effete generation). Originally it applied<br />
to animals and meant that they were no<br />
longer capable <strong>of</strong> producing young. It is not to<br />
be confused with effeminate.<br />
eft. See newt.<br />
egoism; egotism. Egoism is the name for the philosophical<br />
belief that self-interest is the true end<br />
<strong>of</strong> moral actions. As such, it is opposed to<br />
altruism. The egoist relates all questions to himself.<br />
He may believe, that is, that there is no<br />
pro<strong>of</strong> that anything exists but his own mind,<br />
that all other people are perhaps figments <strong>of</strong> his<br />
imagination (Subjective idealism is basically<br />
egoism. The mature man, hardened into skeptical<br />
egoism, knows no monition but thnt <strong>of</strong> his<br />
own frigid cautions).<br />
Egotism, the too frequent use <strong>of</strong> I in conversation,<br />
hence boastfulness, too much interest in<br />
one’s own doings to an exclusion <strong>of</strong> interest in<br />
others, self-conceit, selfishness, is the more common<br />
word (His absorbing egotism was annoying<br />
to all who had to associate with him).<br />
Egoism and egotism do not, necessarily, have to<br />
have anything to do with each other. A selfeffacing<br />
man may be an egoist. An egotist may<br />
have no interest in any philosophy whatsoever.<br />
egregious originally meant out <strong>of</strong> the common,<br />
eminent, outstanding, exceptional; but it has<br />
become entirely pejorative, meaning now distinguished<br />
for some bad quality, flagrant in the<br />
extreme (The man is an egregious ass. His<br />
egregious lies are embarrassing to listen to).<br />
either may be used as an adjective before a singular<br />
noun, as in either one, or standing alone as<br />
a pronoun, as in either will do, or together with<br />
the word or as a conjunction, as in either Sarah<br />
or Babs wrote it.<br />
Either originally meant “each <strong>of</strong> two” or<br />
“both,” as in the trees on either side <strong>of</strong> the river.<br />
The word is used in this sense in English literature<br />
from King Alfred down to Tennyson, Rossetti,<br />
and Stevenson, and including the King<br />
James Bible. Another meaning <strong>of</strong> the word, “one<br />
<strong>of</strong> two, no matter which,” is about five hundred<br />
151 eke<br />
years old. In Great Britain, either in the original<br />
sense <strong>of</strong> “both” is now considered archaic or<br />
Biblical. In the United States it is still natural<br />
English. Either is used in this country in both<br />
senses and both are acceptable.<br />
When either means “both” or “each” it is followed<br />
by a plural verb, as in either <strong>of</strong> them are<br />
enough to drive a man to distraction. Since the<br />
word is not used in this way in Great Britain, the<br />
plural verb is characteristically American. When<br />
what is meant is “only one,” the verb is usually<br />
singular, as in either <strong>of</strong> them is good enough.<br />
But there are exceptions to this. In a negative<br />
statement either is usually treated as a plural, as<br />
in I do not think either <strong>of</strong> them are at home.<br />
The pronoun you is normally followed by a<br />
plural verb form, and we usually say if either <strong>of</strong><br />
you are ready. When words <strong>of</strong> different number<br />
are contrasted, the verb agrees with the nearest<br />
word, as in either he or they are to blame. When<br />
singular pronouns are being contrasted, the strict<br />
rules <strong>of</strong> grammar require the form <strong>of</strong> the verb<br />
that would be appropriate for the last pronoun<br />
mentioned, as in either you or I am to blame.<br />
This is an extremely literary construction. In<br />
practice, some people would treat the combined<br />
words as they and say are and some would treat<br />
them as orie and say is, but most people would<br />
undoubtedly avoid the problem and say either<br />
you are to blame or I am.<br />
Either may be used with any number <strong>of</strong> words<br />
in a series, as in either past, present or future.<br />
It could be argued that in a construction <strong>of</strong> this<br />
kind the comma represents the word or. But<br />
either may also be used simply with the meaning<br />
<strong>of</strong> “any one,” as in either <strong>of</strong> these three. It has<br />
been used in this way for more than three hundred<br />
years. The construction is rare, and disapproved<br />
by some grammarians; but it is found in<br />
the writings <strong>of</strong> Poe, Emerson, 0. W. Holmes,<br />
and is recognized as standard by the Oxford<br />
English <strong>Dictionary</strong>. Writers who use it apparently<br />
feel that any one is too indefinite for their<br />
purposes.<br />
Either is followed by the word or, and never<br />
by the word nor. In current English, the form<br />
either, and not the form neither, should be used<br />
after a verb that has already been made negative<br />
by some other word, as in no one can prevent<br />
me, either and he never told me either. This was<br />
not always true. Shakespeare writes no, nor Z<br />
neither. The old neither can still be heard, but it<br />
is now considered archaic.<br />
The pronoun either has a genitive form, as in<br />
either’s house. The adjective can be used to qualify<br />
a genitive noun, as in either man’s house, but<br />
it cannot follow a genitive noun or any other<br />
definitive, as in the man’s either house. To express<br />
this idea we must use the pronoun form<br />
and say either <strong>of</strong> the man’s houses. See also<br />
double genitives.<br />
eke out. Eke is an Old English word, now archaic,<br />
meaning also (The king himself did eat there<strong>of</strong><br />
/And eke the court beside). To eke yut is, therefore,<br />
to add to something in such a way as to<br />
make it suffice, or at least to make it do better