19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

which produces the desired effect. An effectual<br />

measure or remedy is one that does what was<br />

hoped would be done. A law is effective when<br />

it is in operation, eflectual if it accomplishes its<br />

purpose.<br />

Eficient also means producing the desired<br />

effect, but it has the added connotation, in<br />

modern usage, <strong>of</strong> doing so with a high ratio <strong>of</strong><br />

return for expenditure. It differs from eflectual<br />

in carrying this suggestion and in the fact that it<br />

is applied to persons as well as to things (An<br />

eficient secretary is an eflectual agent for one<br />

who would make his will effective).<br />

Eficacious suggests the capability <strong>of</strong> achieving<br />

a certain end, a capability <strong>of</strong>ten manifested<br />

only when actually employed (an efficacious<br />

drug in the cure <strong>of</strong> these infections). It, too, is<br />

applied only to things, not to persons. See also<br />

affect.<br />

effeminate. See female.<br />

effete is a literary word for exhausted, worn out,<br />

applied to something or someone no longer<br />

creative (an effete generation). Originally it applied<br />

to animals and meant that they were no<br />

longer capable <strong>of</strong> producing young. It is not to<br />

be confused with effeminate.<br />

eft. See newt.<br />

egoism; egotism. Egoism is the name for the philosophical<br />

belief that self-interest is the true end<br />

<strong>of</strong> moral actions. As such, it is opposed to<br />

altruism. The egoist relates all questions to himself.<br />

He may believe, that is, that there is no<br />

pro<strong>of</strong> that anything exists but his own mind,<br />

that all other people are perhaps figments <strong>of</strong> his<br />

imagination (Subjective idealism is basically<br />

egoism. The mature man, hardened into skeptical<br />

egoism, knows no monition but thnt <strong>of</strong> his<br />

own frigid cautions).<br />

Egotism, the too frequent use <strong>of</strong> I in conversation,<br />

hence boastfulness, too much interest in<br />

one’s own doings to an exclusion <strong>of</strong> interest in<br />

others, self-conceit, selfishness, is the more common<br />

word (His absorbing egotism was annoying<br />

to all who had to associate with him).<br />

Egoism and egotism do not, necessarily, have to<br />

have anything to do with each other. A selfeffacing<br />

man may be an egoist. An egotist may<br />

have no interest in any philosophy whatsoever.<br />

egregious originally meant out <strong>of</strong> the common,<br />

eminent, outstanding, exceptional; but it has<br />

become entirely pejorative, meaning now distinguished<br />

for some bad quality, flagrant in the<br />

extreme (The man is an egregious ass. His<br />

egregious lies are embarrassing to listen to).<br />

either may be used as an adjective before a singular<br />

noun, as in either one, or standing alone as<br />

a pronoun, as in either will do, or together with<br />

the word or as a conjunction, as in either Sarah<br />

or Babs wrote it.<br />

Either originally meant “each <strong>of</strong> two” or<br />

“both,” as in the trees on either side <strong>of</strong> the river.<br />

The word is used in this sense in English literature<br />

from King Alfred down to Tennyson, Rossetti,<br />

and Stevenson, and including the King<br />

James Bible. Another meaning <strong>of</strong> the word, “one<br />

<strong>of</strong> two, no matter which,” is about five hundred<br />

151 eke<br />

years old. In Great Britain, either in the original<br />

sense <strong>of</strong> “both” is now considered archaic or<br />

Biblical. In the United States it is still natural<br />

English. Either is used in this country in both<br />

senses and both are acceptable.<br />

When either means “both” or “each” it is followed<br />

by a plural verb, as in either <strong>of</strong> them are<br />

enough to drive a man to distraction. Since the<br />

word is not used in this way in Great Britain, the<br />

plural verb is characteristically American. When<br />

what is meant is “only one,” the verb is usually<br />

singular, as in either <strong>of</strong> them is good enough.<br />

But there are exceptions to this. In a negative<br />

statement either is usually treated as a plural, as<br />

in I do not think either <strong>of</strong> them are at home.<br />

The pronoun you is normally followed by a<br />

plural verb form, and we usually say if either <strong>of</strong><br />

you are ready. When words <strong>of</strong> different number<br />

are contrasted, the verb agrees with the nearest<br />

word, as in either he or they are to blame. When<br />

singular pronouns are being contrasted, the strict<br />

rules <strong>of</strong> grammar require the form <strong>of</strong> the verb<br />

that would be appropriate for the last pronoun<br />

mentioned, as in either you or I am to blame.<br />

This is an extremely literary construction. In<br />

practice, some people would treat the combined<br />

words as they and say are and some would treat<br />

them as orie and say is, but most people would<br />

undoubtedly avoid the problem and say either<br />

you are to blame or I am.<br />

Either may be used with any number <strong>of</strong> words<br />

in a series, as in either past, present or future.<br />

It could be argued that in a construction <strong>of</strong> this<br />

kind the comma represents the word or. But<br />

either may also be used simply with the meaning<br />

<strong>of</strong> “any one,” as in either <strong>of</strong> these three. It has<br />

been used in this way for more than three hundred<br />

years. The construction is rare, and disapproved<br />

by some grammarians; but it is found in<br />

the writings <strong>of</strong> Poe, Emerson, 0. W. Holmes,<br />

and is recognized as standard by the Oxford<br />

English <strong>Dictionary</strong>. Writers who use it apparently<br />

feel that any one is too indefinite for their<br />

purposes.<br />

Either is followed by the word or, and never<br />

by the word nor. In current English, the form<br />

either, and not the form neither, should be used<br />

after a verb that has already been made negative<br />

by some other word, as in no one can prevent<br />

me, either and he never told me either. This was<br />

not always true. Shakespeare writes no, nor Z<br />

neither. The old neither can still be heard, but it<br />

is now considered archaic.<br />

The pronoun either has a genitive form, as in<br />

either’s house. The adjective can be used to qualify<br />

a genitive noun, as in either man’s house, but<br />

it cannot follow a genitive noun or any other<br />

definitive, as in the man’s either house. To express<br />

this idea we must use the pronoun form<br />

and say either <strong>of</strong> the man’s houses. See also<br />

double genitives.<br />

eke out. Eke is an Old English word, now archaic,<br />

meaning also (The king himself did eat there<strong>of</strong><br />

/And eke the court beside). To eke yut is, therefore,<br />

to add to something in such a way as to<br />

make it suffice, or at least to make it do better

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!