19.04.2013 Views

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

A Dictionary of Cont..

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ut they extract the facts the police want). To<br />

extort is to get information in much the same<br />

manner as to extract it, though there is a connotation<br />

<strong>of</strong> more violence and ruthlessness. Illegal<br />

demands, such as ransoms in kidnapping<br />

cases, are extortions. When information is said<br />

to have been extorted, there is a suggestion that<br />

there has been strong resistance to giving it up.<br />

elicit; illicit. Nothing but sheer ignorance could<br />

confuse elicit and illicit. Elicit is a verb, meaning<br />

to draw out (figuratively), to educe, to evoke<br />

(Clever auestioninp further elicited the fact that<br />

he had ieen at G&nston several times before<br />

this “first visit”). Illicit is an adjective meaning<br />

unlawful (illicit love).<br />

elk; deer; wapiti; moose. The animal which in the<br />

United States is called the elk is the wapiti, a<br />

species <strong>of</strong> deer (Cervus canadensis) with long,<br />

slender antlers. Its equivalent in England,<br />

scarcely distinguishable, is the red deer, the male<br />

<strong>of</strong> which is the stag. By the word elk the English<br />

designate an animal (Alces alces) closely resembling<br />

what in America is called a moose<br />

(Alces americanus or the Alaskan variety Alces<br />

gigas), the male <strong>of</strong> which has large palmate<br />

antlers. And if this is not confusing enough, the<br />

word moose is sometimes used in England to<br />

designate the European elk (Alces machlis). Ten<br />

minutes spent in trying to unravel this and half<br />

a dozen other popular names for birds and<br />

mammals will show the layman why scientists<br />

use Latin names for species.<br />

ell in common English usage is solely a measure<br />

<strong>of</strong> distance. This meaning is known in<br />

America but is now restricted almost entirely<br />

to the saying Give him an ell and he’ll take a<br />

mile. An ell in America (or an el) more generally<br />

means the extension <strong>of</strong> a building, usually<br />

at right angles to one end (Grandfather<br />

built the ell after Aunt Susan got married and<br />

came to live with him on the furm). Some believe<br />

that this is derived from the fact that the<br />

addition and the main building then form a<br />

letter L, and so it may be, but Old English uses<br />

<strong>of</strong> the word in this sense, for it was formerly<br />

known in England, though it survives only in<br />

dialects, suggest that it may have derived from<br />

aisle, which meant wing.<br />

El is used a great deal in America as an abbreviation<br />

for elevated railroad. This meaning<br />

is unknown in England.<br />

ellipse; ellipsis. An ellipse is a term used in geometry.<br />

It means a plane curve such that the sums<br />

<strong>of</strong> the distances <strong>of</strong> each point in its periphery<br />

from two fixed points, the foci, are equal. It is<br />

a conic section formed by the intersection <strong>of</strong> a<br />

right circular cone by a plane which cuts<br />

obliquely the axis and the opposite sides <strong>of</strong> the<br />

cone.<br />

Ellipsis is a term used in grammar. It means<br />

the omission from a sentence <strong>of</strong> a word or words<br />

that are essential to its grammatical completeness,<br />

though not necessarily to the completeness<br />

<strong>of</strong> its sense.<br />

Some authorities would have elliptic the ad-<br />

153 ellipsis<br />

jective for ellipse and elliptical for ellipsis, but in<br />

American usage elliptic is simply a rare form <strong>of</strong><br />

elliptical.<br />

ellipsis. The plural is ellipses.<br />

This term is used by some grammarians to<br />

refer to words that do not actually occur in a<br />

sentence but which they feel are needed in making<br />

a certain kind <strong>of</strong> grammatical analysis or to<br />

explain a grammatical construction. These words<br />

are sometimes described as “words which the<br />

hearer easily supplies.”<br />

There is no doubt that English allows us to<br />

omit a great many words that we could have<br />

used without changing the meaning in any way.<br />

For example, some verb which is known to the<br />

hearer has obviously been omitted from the end<br />

<strong>of</strong> the statement he doesn’t want to. Some grammarians,<br />

abusing the privilege <strong>of</strong> putting words<br />

into another person’s mouth, recognize no limit<br />

to the number <strong>of</strong> words which they may read<br />

into a sentence. It has been claimed that the<br />

word fire! satisfies a certain definition <strong>of</strong> a sentence<br />

because it represents an ellipsis, which may<br />

be (there is a) fire (here) or (you men) fire<br />

(your guns). It is sometimes said that a sentence<br />

such as no one saw it but me is ungrammatical<br />

and should be no one saw it but I because there<br />

is an ellipsis <strong>of</strong> the word sa~v. The answer to<br />

arguments <strong>of</strong> this kind is to say: “If I had meant<br />

saw, I would have said I saw.” No one should<br />

allow himself to be convicted <strong>of</strong> bad grammar<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> words he has not used.<br />

On the other hand, some grammarians seem<br />

to think that the composer <strong>of</strong> a sentence may not<br />

omit any word which does not appear elsewhere<br />

in the sentence in the same grammatical form.<br />

It is claimed that Z was young, they old is ungrammatical<br />

because the word to be supplied is<br />

were and not was. All writers and speakers <strong>of</strong><br />

English, including these very grammarians themselves,<br />

omit words which never will be missed,<br />

whether they have already been used in the sentence<br />

or not. This is never objectionable unless<br />

the sentence becomes misleading, that is, unless<br />

the omitted words actually are missed. English<br />

that leaves nothing at all to the imagination becomes<br />

tiresome, and even insulting.<br />

Speech is highly elliptical. It would scarcely<br />

be endurable otherwise. Ellipsis is indispensable<br />

to the writer or speaker who wants to be brief<br />

and pithy, but it can easily cause confusion and<br />

obscurity and must be used with skill.<br />

ellipsis marks have the following uses:<br />

To indicate omissions in a quotation, as in<br />

Give me liberty or . . . death! If in a longer<br />

quotation the ellipsis includes the end <strong>of</strong> a sentence,<br />

the period joins the ellipsis and makes a<br />

total <strong>of</strong> four dots.<br />

To show hesitation or the passage <strong>of</strong> time in<br />

dialogue or narrative, as in Please, please . . .<br />

you mustn’t leave and The time passed very<br />

slowly. . . and Sarah became sleepier and sleepier.<br />

Ellipses are now shown by three periods. They<br />

were once shown by three asterisks, and aster

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!