10.06.2013 Views

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

130 Section 2 The Era of Mass Society and Mass Culture<br />

or other minority groups at low cost, and the Internet<br />

has made it possible for even the smallest<br />

groups to enter their voices into the marketplace<br />

of ideas. But some critics see the rise of many such<br />

small groups as a Balkanization of the larger U.S.<br />

culture. Before we can judge the validity of this<br />

worry, however, the normative <strong>theory</strong> on which<br />

our media system is grounded must be reformulated,<br />

especially given technological and economic<br />

changes reshaping the media. This will require a<br />

critical reexamination of social responsibility <strong>theory</strong><br />

and careful consideration of alternatives.<br />

Alternative normative theories, however, already<br />

exist, although they may not be a good fit<br />

for our political and social system. Developmental<br />

media <strong>theory</strong> advocates media support for an<br />

Critical Thinking Questions<br />

1. Do you read news blogs? If so, which ones?<br />

Which engage primarily in commentary and<br />

which do original reporting? Do you trust<br />

these online news sites more or less than you<br />

do more traditional media outlets? Why or<br />

why not? Do you agree with Nick Carr that<br />

blogs have lost their fire, or are you with<br />

Andrew Sullivan in thinking that their unique<br />

writer-reader relationship creates something<br />

so different from what was once considered<br />

reporting that they will usher in “a golden era<br />

for journalism”? Defend your answer.<br />

2. Libertarianism is based on the self-righting<br />

principle—if all the information is available,<br />

good ideas will survive and bad ideas will<br />

die. But this also assumes that the “debate”<br />

between the ideas is fair. Do you think fairness<br />

can be achieved in contemporary <strong>mass</strong><br />

Key Terms<br />

social responsibility<br />

<strong>theory</strong><br />

radical Libertarian<br />

First Amendment<br />

absolutists<br />

technocratic control<br />

existing political regime in its efforts to foster<br />

national economic development. Democraticparticipant<br />

<strong>theory</strong> advocates media support for<br />

grassroots cultural pluralism. Hachten offered<br />

five concepts: (1) Western, combining Libertarian<br />

and social responsibility ideals; (2) development,<br />

something akin to developmental media <strong>theory</strong>;<br />

(3) revolutionary, in which the people and media<br />

professionals use <strong>mass</strong> media to challenge an existing<br />

regime; and (4) authoritarian and (5) communism,<br />

in which media serve the dictates of<br />

those in power. Recently, however, there have<br />

been calls for a less category-based and more flexible<br />

approach to normative theories, a transitional<br />

media approach to evaluating a given society’s<br />

media system.<br />

media? Libertarianism also assumes that<br />

people are good and rational, that they can<br />

tell good ideas from bad ideas. Do you think<br />

this highly of your fellow citizens? Why or<br />

why not?<br />

3. Social responsibility <strong>theory</strong> assumes a press<br />

that balances profit and service under the<br />

watch of an interested public. Many critics,<br />

as you’ve read, believe the media have<br />

favored profit over service as the public has<br />

remained disinterested. But if journalism<br />

becomes the product of a primarily nonprofit<br />

or philanthropic system, how might<br />

social responsibility <strong>theory</strong> have to be<br />

reconfigured? What will it mean if profit is<br />

no longer essential? What additional demands,<br />

if any, will this place on the public?<br />

authoritarian <strong>theory</strong><br />

self-righting principle<br />

Bill of Rights<br />

marketplace of ideas<br />

laissez-faire doctrine<br />

Fourth Estate<br />

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).<br />

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!