10.06.2013 Views

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

350 Section 4 Contemporary Mass Communication Theory<br />

INSTANT ACCESS<br />

The Commodification of Culture<br />

Strengths Weaknesses<br />

1. Provides basis for social change<br />

2. Identifies problems created by repackaging of<br />

cultural content<br />

1. Argues for, but does not empirically demonstrate,<br />

effects<br />

2. Has overly pessimistic view of media influence<br />

and average people<br />

Although this can have positive benefits (see Chapter 5), media practitioners<br />

can also use it to justify routine production practices while they reject potentially<br />

useful innovations.<br />

5. Disruption of everyday life takes many forms—some disruptions are obviously<br />

linked to consumption of especially deleterious content, but other forms are<br />

very subtle and occur over long periods. Disruption ranges from propagation<br />

of misconceptions about the social world—like those cultivation analysis has<br />

examined—to disruption of social institutions. Consequences can be both microscopic<br />

and macroscopic and may take many different forms. For example,<br />

Joshua Meyrowitz (1985) argued that media deprive us of a sense of place.<br />

Neil Postman (1985) believes that media focus too much on entertainment,<br />

with serious long-term consequences. He has also examined media disruption<br />

in books entitled The Disappearance of Childhood (1994) and The End of<br />

Education (1996). Disruption of childhood, as you saw in Chapter 7, is also<br />

the focus of Susan Linn’s Consuming Kids (2004), Benjamin Barber’s Consumed:<br />

How Markets Corrupt Children, Infantilize Adults, and Swallow Citizens<br />

Whole (2007), and Shirley Steinberg and Joe Kincheloe’s Kinderculture:<br />

The Corporate Construction of Childhood (1997). Kathleen Jamieson (1988)<br />

lamented the decline of political speech making brought about by electronic<br />

media and, with Karlyn Campbell (1997), media’s corruption of the meaning<br />

of citizen action. Michael Parenti (1992), in Make-Believe Media: The Politics<br />

of Entertainment, also explores this theme.<br />

ADVERTISING: THE ULTIMATE CULTURAL COMMODITY<br />

Not surprisingly, critical cultural studies researchers direct some of their most devastating<br />

criticism toward advertising. They view it as the ultimate cultural commodity<br />

(Hay, 1989; Jhally, 1987). Advertising packages promotional messages so<br />

they will be attended to and acted on by people who often have little interest in<br />

and often no real need for most of the advertised products or services. Marketers<br />

routinely portray consumption of specific products as the best way to construct a<br />

worthwhile personal identity, have fun, make friends and influence people, or solve<br />

problems (often ones we never knew we had). You deserve a break today. Just do<br />

it. DewMocracy!<br />

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).<br />

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!