10.06.2013 Views

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

318 Section 4 Contemporary Mass Communication Theory<br />

are essentially meaningless except to others who know how to decode them. When<br />

we write, we cover pages with complicated markings. To read them, someone must<br />

be literate in our language. According to Mead, the use of symbols transforms the<br />

socialization process—freeing it from the bonds of both space and time. Using symbols,<br />

we can create vivid representations of the past, and we can anticipate the future.<br />

We can be transported anywhere on the globe or even into the far reaches of<br />

space.<br />

In Mind, Self, and Society, Mead (1934) argues that we use symbols to create<br />

our experience of consciousness (mind), our understanding of ourselves (self), and<br />

our knowledge of the larger social order (society). In other words, symbols mediate<br />

and structure all our experience because they structure our ability to perceive and<br />

interpret what goes on around us. This argument is similar to the one made by<br />

information-processing theorists (see Chapter 9). In information-processing <strong>theory</strong>,<br />

sets of symbols called schemas that we have learned in the past enable us to routinely<br />

make sense of the new sensory information we take in. Mead believed that<br />

mind, self, and society are internalized as complex sets of symbols. They serve as<br />

filtering mechanisms for our experiences. For information-processing theorists,<br />

schemas perform a similar function.<br />

This might seem to be an extreme argument. Most of us take for granted our<br />

ability to look at the world around us and see the things that are obviously there.<br />

We might assume that we were born with this ability. But think about it. Why do<br />

we notice certain things and not others? As we move through daily life we’re<br />

constantly encountering ambiguous, complex situations. Unless we are unusually<br />

fastidious, for example, we will not notice small amounts of dust and dirt when<br />

we enter a room. We’ll ignore most of the background sounds. According to<br />

Mead, human perceptual processes are extremely malleable and can be shaped by<br />

the sets of symbols we learn so that we will see only what our culture has determined<br />

is worth seeing. (Has your perception of Middle Eastern cultures changed<br />

since September 11, 2001? Are you more likely now to notice a woman wearing a<br />

head scarf? What mental images spring to mind when you hear the word terrorist?<br />

Twenty years ago the image might have been of an Irish Republican Army bomber<br />

or a Latin American drug criminal—now it’s most likely a Middle Eastern male.)<br />

Mead’s arguments anticipated cognitive psychology research, which is beginning<br />

to empirically demonstrate much of what he hypothesized.<br />

Thus symbolic interactionism posits that our actions in response to symbols are<br />

mediated (or controlled) largely by those same symbols. Therefore, a person’s understanding<br />

of and relation to physical or objective reality is mediated by the symbolic<br />

environment—the mind, self, and society we have internalized. Put another<br />

way, the meanings we give to symbols define us and the realities we experience.<br />

As we are socialized, culturally agreed-upon meanings assume control over our interactions<br />

with our environments.<br />

Consider the meaning that you attach to the stitched red, white, and blue cloth<br />

that constitutes an American flag. A flag is, in reality (objectively), little more than<br />

a piece of colored cloth. That is, it is little more than a piece of cloth until someone<br />

attaches symbolic meaning to it. We have decided that a particular array and formulation<br />

of colors and shapes should become our flag. Each of us experiences the<br />

flag differently, yet there is shared meaning as well. To many who support the<br />

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).<br />

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!