10.06.2013 Views

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INSTANT ACCESS<br />

Information-Flow Theory<br />

Strengths Weaknesses<br />

1. Examines process of <strong>mass</strong> <strong>communication</strong> in<br />

real world<br />

2. Provides theoretical basis for successful public<br />

information campaigns<br />

3. Identifies barriers to information flow<br />

4. Helps the understanding of information flow<br />

during crises<br />

information-flow<br />

<strong>theory</strong><br />

Theory of how<br />

information<br />

moves from<br />

media to audiences<br />

to have<br />

specific intended<br />

effects (now<br />

known as information<br />

or innovation<br />

diffusion<br />

<strong>theory</strong>)<br />

source-dominated<br />

<strong>theory</strong><br />

Theory that<br />

examines the<br />

<strong>communication</strong><br />

process from the<br />

point of view of<br />

some elite message<br />

source<br />

Chapter 6 The Rise of Limited-Effects Theory 163<br />

1. Is simplistic, linear, and source-dominated<br />

2. Assumes ignorant, apathetic populace<br />

3. Fails to consider utility or value of<br />

information for receivers<br />

4. Is too accepting of status quo<br />

the researchers designed another field experiment in which people were supposed<br />

to tell their neighbors about a slogan for a new brand of coffee. Survey teams visited<br />

homes in a small town and told people that they could earn a free pound of<br />

coffee by teaching their neighbors the coffee slogan. The survey team promised to<br />

return the following week, and if they found that neighbors knew the slogan, then<br />

both families would receive free coffee. The experiment produced mixed results. On<br />

the one hand, almost every neighboring family had heard about the coffee slogan<br />

and tried to reproduce it. Unfortunately, many gave the wrong slogan. The<br />

researchers reported interesting distortions of the original slogan; many people had<br />

shortened it, confused it with similar slogans, or recited garbled phrases containing<br />

a few key words. The research confirmed the importance of motivating people to<br />

pass on information, but it suggested that even a free gift was insufficient to guarantee<br />

the accurate flow of information. If word of mouth was crucial to the flow of<br />

information, the possibility of distortion and misunderstanding was high. Even if<br />

media deliver accurate information, the news that reaches most people might be<br />

wrong.<br />

The most important limitation of information-flow <strong>theory</strong> is that it is a simplistic,<br />

linear, source-dominated <strong>theory</strong>. Information originates with authoritative or elite<br />

sources (the established media or the government, for example) and then flows outward<br />

to “ignorant” individuals. It assumes that barriers to the flow of information<br />

can be identified and overcome, but little effort is typically made to consider whether<br />

the information has any value or use for average audience members. Audience reactions<br />

to messages are ignored unless they form a barrier to that flow. Then those barriers<br />

must be studied only so they can be overcome. Like most limited-effects theories,<br />

information-flow <strong>theory</strong> assumes that the status quo is acceptable. Elites and authorities<br />

are justified in trying to disseminate certain forms of information, and average<br />

people will be better off if they receive and learn it. Barriers are assumed to be bad<br />

and, where possible, must be eliminated. Information-flow <strong>theory</strong> is also an example<br />

of a middle-range <strong>theory</strong>. It serves to summarize a large number of empirical generalizations<br />

into a more or less coherent explanation of when and why media information<br />

will be attended to and what sorts of learning will result.<br />

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).<br />

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!