10.06.2013 Views

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ias of<br />

<strong>communication</strong><br />

Innis’s idea that<br />

<strong>communication</strong><br />

technology makes<br />

centralization of<br />

power inevitable<br />

orders from the capital city. Similarly, the structure of later social orders also depended<br />

on the media technology available at a certain point in time. For example,<br />

the telephone and telegraph permitted even more effective control over larger geographic<br />

areas. Everett Rogers paraphrased Innis: “The changing technology of<br />

<strong>communication</strong> acted to reduce the cost and increase the speed and distance of<br />

<strong>communication</strong>, and thus to extend the geographic size of empires” (2000, p.<br />

126). As such, the introduction of new media technology gradually gave centralized<br />

elites increased power over space and time.<br />

Innis traced the way Canadian elites used various technologies, including the<br />

railroad and telegraph, to extend their control across the continent. As a political<br />

economist, he harbored a deep suspicion of centralized power and believed that<br />

newer forms of <strong>communication</strong> technology would make even greater centralization<br />

inevitable. He referred to this as the inherent bias of <strong>communication</strong>. Because<br />

of this bias, the people and the resources of outlying regions that he called the<br />

periphery are inevitably exploited to serve the interests of elites at the center.<br />

MCLUHAN: UNDERSTANDING MEDIA<br />

the medium is the<br />

message<br />

McLuhan’s idea<br />

that new forms of<br />

media transform<br />

our experience of<br />

ourselves and our<br />

society, and this<br />

influence is ultimately<br />

more important<br />

than the<br />

content of specific<br />

messages<br />

global village<br />

McLuhan’s conception<br />

of a new<br />

form of social<br />

organization<br />

emerging as instantaneouselectronic<br />

media tie<br />

the entire world<br />

into one great social,<br />

political, and<br />

cultural system<br />

Chapter 8 The Emergence of Critical and Cultural Theories of Mass Communication 231<br />

Although he borrowed freely from Innis, McLuhan didn’t dwell on issues of exploitation<br />

or centralized control. His views on the cultural consequences of capitalistdominated<br />

media were much more optimistic than those of the Frankfurt School.<br />

He was fascinated by the implications of Innis’s arguments concerning the transformative<br />

power of media technology. He didn’t fear the ways this power might be<br />

exercised by elites. If the technology itself determines how it can be used, then there<br />

is nothing to fear from elites. If media could be used to create empires, what else<br />

could they do? Was it possible that media could transform our sensory experiences<br />

as well as our social order? After all, the acts of reading a book and viewing a<br />

movie or television program employ different sensory organs. During the 1960s,<br />

we were clearly moving from an era grounded in print technology to one based on<br />

electronic media. McLuhan asked an important question: “If <strong>communication</strong> technology<br />

plays such a critical role in the emergence of new social orders and new<br />

forms of culture, what are the implications of abandoning print media in favor of<br />

electronic media?”<br />

McLuhan explained his vision of the implications of the spread of electronic<br />

media using catchy, and what proved to be lasting, phrases. He proclaimed that<br />

the medium is the message (and the <strong>mass</strong>age). In other words, new forms of media<br />

transform (<strong>mass</strong>age) our experience of ourselves and our society, and this influence<br />

is ultimately more important than the content that is transmitted in its specific messages—technology<br />

determines experience.<br />

He used the term global village to refer to the new form of social organization<br />

that would inevitably emerge as instantaneous electronic media tied the entire<br />

world into one great social, political, and cultural system. Unlike Innis, McLuhan<br />

didn’t bother to concern himself with questions about control over this village or<br />

whether village members would be exploited. To McLuhan, these questions didn’t<br />

matter. He was more concerned with microscopic issues, with the impact of media<br />

on our senses and where this influence might lead.<br />

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).<br />

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!