10.06.2013 Views

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

348 Section 4 Contemporary Mass Communication Theory<br />

commodification of culture. How did rap evolve from its roots in urban verbal<br />

warfare into a billion-dollar recording genre and vehicle for paid product placements<br />

(Kaufman, 2003)?<br />

Commodification-of-culture theorists argue that this strategy has been especially<br />

successful in the United States, where media entrepreneurs have remained relatively<br />

independent from political institutions. Mass culture gained steadily in<br />

popularity, spawning huge industries that successfully competed for the attention<br />

and interest of most Americans. As a result, compared to what occurred in Europe,<br />

criticism of <strong>mass</strong> culture in the United States was muted. Most Americans accepted<br />

the cultural commodities emerging from New York and Hollywood as somehow<br />

their own. But these same commodities aroused considerable controversy when<br />

U.S. media entrepreneurs exported them to other nations. The power of these commodities<br />

to reshape daily life was more obvious in most Third World nations, and<br />

even more disruptive.<br />

In The Media Are American (1977), Jeremy Tunstall provided a cogent<br />

description of how American media entrepreneurs developed their strategy for<br />

creating universally attractive cultural commodities. He also traced how they succeeded<br />

internationally against strong competition from formerly dominant world<br />

powers France and Britain. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries,<br />

American entrepreneurs had access to powerful new <strong>communication</strong>s technology<br />

but no clear notion of how it could be used to make profits. Most big industrialists<br />

regarded media as no more than minor and highly speculative enterprises.<br />

Few were willing to invest the money necessary to create viable industries. How<br />

could messages broadcast through the air or crude black-and-white moving<br />

images on a movie screen be used to earn profits? Would people really pay to<br />

see or hear these things? How should industries be organized to manufacture<br />

and market cultural products? Most early attempts to answer these questions<br />

failed, but through trial and effort, wily entrepreneurs eventually developed a successful<br />

strategy.<br />

According to Tunstall, Tin Pan Alley in New York City provided a model later<br />

emulated by other U.S. media industries. The authors of popular music specialized<br />

in taking melodies from folk music and transforming them into short, attractive<br />

songs. These were easily marketed to <strong>mass</strong> audiences who didn’t have the time or<br />

the aesthetic training to appreciate longer, more sophisticated forms of music. In<br />

its early days, Tin Pan Alley was a musical sweatshop in which songwriters were<br />

poorly paid and overworked, while sheet music and recording company entrepreneurs<br />

reaped huge profits. By keeping production and distribution costs low, rapid<br />

expansion was possible and profits grew accordingly. Inevitably, expansion carried<br />

the entrepreneurs beyond the United States. Because many were first-generation European<br />

immigrants, they knew how to return to and gain a foothold in Europe.<br />

The Second World War provided an ideal opportunity to further subvert European<br />

culture. The American military demanded and received permission to import <strong>mass</strong>ive<br />

quantities of U.S.–style popular culture into Europe, where it proved popular.<br />

American Armed Forces Radio was especially influential in its broadcasts of popular<br />

music and entertainment shows.<br />

What are the consequences of lifting bits of the culture of everyday life out of<br />

their context, repackaging them, and then marketing them back to people?<br />

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).<br />

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!