10.06.2013 Views

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

50 Section 2 The Era of Mass Society and Mass Culture<br />

newer media. Most corporations controlling network television have already diversified<br />

their holdings and purchased companies that operate the new media. For<br />

example, whereas there was once NBC Television, there is now NBC Universal<br />

Television Studios, NBC Universal Television Distribution, the NBC Television<br />

Network, 27 local television stations, NBC Digital Media, cable channels MSNBC<br />

(produced in conjunction with Microsoft), Bravo, Mun2TV, Trio, USA, and SyFy,<br />

all-news cable channel CNBC, Spanish-language television network Telemundo<br />

and its 14 stations, World Wide Web sites for each of these holdings, partial ownership<br />

of Internet video site Hulu, cable and satellite companies in Europe and<br />

Asia, and theme parks used to promote NBC television programs. In 2010, these<br />

entities became part of Comcast, the nation’s largest cable company and biggest<br />

provider of broadband Internet into American homes. CBS, through its parent<br />

company, Viacom, and ABC, through its parent, Disney, are also linked to a long<br />

list of other media enterprises.<br />

The success of new media often brings a strong critical reaction—especially<br />

when media adopt questionable competitive strategies to produce content or attract<br />

consumers. During the era of the penny press, <strong>mass</strong> newspapers quickly displaced<br />

small-circulation, specialized papers, and many did so using highly suspect formulas<br />

for creating content. These strategies became even more questionable as competition<br />

increased for the attention of readers. Compared to yellow journalism,<br />

current-day “trash TV” programs like Cops, Real Housewives of New Jersey, and<br />

Jersey Shore are as tame as fluffy puppies. But yellow journalists justified their<br />

practices by arguing that “everyone else is doing it” and “the public likes it or else<br />

they wouldn’t buy it—we’re only giving the people what they want.”<br />

New media industries often do specialize in giving people what they want—<br />

even if the long-term consequences might be negative. We see this in the current controversies<br />

over online indecency and hate speech. Unlike the “established” older<br />

media, new media lack the ties to other traditional social institutions that encourage<br />

or compel social responsibility. As each of the new media technologies developed,<br />

and as industries grew up around them to ensure stable supplies of attractive (if<br />

questionable) content, these technologies and industries necessarily displaced earlier<br />

industries and forms of <strong>communication</strong>. Often social roles and relationships were<br />

seriously disrupted as people adjusted to new media and their content. Most of these<br />

problems were seemingly impossible to anticipate. For example, during the 1950s,<br />

one of the first serious sociological studies of television’s impact on American life<br />

found little evidence of disruption. The study noted that one of the most important<br />

changes brought about by television was that people spent less time playing cards<br />

with extended family members or friends. On the other hand, nuclear families actually<br />

spent more time together—mesmerized in front of the ghostly shadows on tiny<br />

television screens. They spent less time talking with neighbors and friends. Research<br />

by Wilbur Schramm, Jack Lyle, and Edwin Parker (1961) reported optimistically<br />

that towns with television actually had higher levels of library use and lower comic<br />

book sales than those with only radio. Given widespread public distrust of comic<br />

books in the 1950s, these findings implied that television could be a positive force.<br />

We see this pattern mirrored today—those who argue that the Internet will eventually<br />

produce a return to greater participatory democracy counter critics of controversial<br />

online content. Some critics of the Internet worry that it will encourage social<br />

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).<br />

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!