10.06.2013 Views

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

344 Section 4 Contemporary Mass Communication Theory<br />

message system<br />

analysis<br />

In cultivation<br />

analysis, detailed<br />

content analyses<br />

of television programming<br />

to assess<br />

recurring and<br />

consistent presentations<br />

of images,<br />

themes, values,<br />

and portrayals<br />

cultivation<br />

In cultivation<br />

analysis, television’scontribution<br />

to the<br />

creation of a culture’s<br />

frameworks<br />

or knowledge and<br />

underlying general<br />

concepts<br />

mainstreaming<br />

In cultivation<br />

analysis, the process,<br />

especially for<br />

heavier viewers,<br />

by which television’s<br />

symbols<br />

monopolize and<br />

dominate other<br />

sources of information<br />

and ideas<br />

about the world<br />

message system analysis, detailed content analyses of television programming to assess<br />

its most recurring and consistent presentations of images, themes, values, and<br />

portrayals. The second step is the formulation of questions about viewers’ social realities.<br />

Remember the earlier questions about crime? Those were drawn from a cultivation<br />

study. The third step is to survey the audience, posing the questions from<br />

step two to its members and asking them about their amount of television consumption.<br />

Finally, step four entails comparing the social realities of light and heavy<br />

viewers. The product, as described by Michael Morgan and Nancy Signorielli,<br />

should not be surprising: “The questions posed to respondents do not mention television,<br />

and the respondents’ awareness of the source of their information is seen as<br />

irrelevant. The resulting relationships … between amount of viewing and the tendency<br />

to respond to these questions in the terms of the dominant and repetitive<br />

facts, values, and ideologies of the world of television … illuminate television’s contribution<br />

to viewers’ conceptions of social reality” (2003, p. 99).<br />

What is television’s contribution? Cultivation theorists argue that its major<br />

contribution is cultivation, a cultural process relating “to coherent frameworks or<br />

knowledge and to underlying general concepts … cultivated by exposure to the total<br />

and organically related world of television rather than exposure to individual<br />

programs and selections” (Gerbner, 1990, p. 255).<br />

This cultivation occurs in two ways. The first is mainstreaming, where, especially<br />

for heavier viewers, television’s symbols monopolize and dominate other<br />

sources of information and ideas about the world. People’s internalized social realities<br />

eventually move toward the mainstream, not a mainstream in any political<br />

sense, but a culturally dominant reality more closely aligned with television’s reality<br />

than with any objective reality. Is the criminal justice system failing us? It is if we<br />

think it is.<br />

The second way cultivation manifests itself is through resonance, when viewers<br />

see things on television that are most congruent with their own everyday realities.<br />

In essence, these people get a “double dose” of cultivation because what they see<br />

on the screen resonates with their actual lives. Some city dwellers, for example,<br />

might see the violent world of television resonated in their deteriorating<br />

neighborhoods.<br />

THE MEAN WORLD INDEX<br />

Referring specifically to mainstreaming and resonance, cultivation pioneer Michael<br />

resonance<br />

In cultivation<br />

analysis, when<br />

viewers see things<br />

on television that<br />

are congruent<br />

with their own<br />

everyday realities<br />

Morgan and his colleagues wrote, “But cultivation analysis is not limited to cases<br />

when television ‘facts’ vary from real-world … statistics. The repetitive ‘lessons’ we<br />

learn from television, beginning with infancy, can become the basis for a broader<br />

world view, making television a significant source of general values, ideologies, and<br />

perspectives as well as specific beliefs. Some of the most interesting and important<br />

issues for cultivation analysis involve the symbolic transformation of message system<br />

data into more general issues and assumptions” (Morgan, Shanahan, and Signorielli,<br />

2009, p. 39). As an example, cultivation researchers present the Mean World Index,a<br />

series of three questions:<br />

1. Do you believe that most people are just looking out for themselves?<br />

2. Do you think that you can’t be too careful in dealing with people?<br />

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).<br />

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!