10.06.2013 Views

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 10 Media and Society: The Role of Media in the Social World 287<br />

The hierarchy-of-effects model was first developed by product marketers but is<br />

now widely applied to social marketing. Critics argue that its assumption that<br />

certain effects necessarily precede others in time is unwarranted. Some people, for<br />

example, can be moved to act without ever being informed or even making a decision<br />

about an issue or a candidate. Social marketers respond that although they<br />

can’t hope to induce all the desired effects in every targeted person, they have evidence<br />

that a well-structured step-by-step campaign using survey data to provide<br />

feedback is much more successful than persuasion efforts based on simple linear<br />

effects models.<br />

Critics of social marketing point to limitations very similar to those raised in<br />

our discussion of information-flow <strong>theory</strong> and of diffusion <strong>theory</strong>. Though social<br />

marketing <strong>theory</strong> squeezes some benefit out of the older source-dominated lineareffects<br />

models, it also suffers many of their limitations. In social marketing models,<br />

sources use feedback from target audiences to adjust their campaigns. This use is<br />

generally limited to changes in messages; however, long-term persuasion or information<br />

goals don’t change. If audiences seem resistant, social marketers try new<br />

messages in an effort to break down resistance. They give little thought to whether<br />

the audience might be justified or correct in resisting information or influence. If<br />

the effort to get out information fails, they blame the audience for being apathetic<br />

or ignorant—people simply don’t know what’s good for them.<br />

Thus the social marketing model is tailored to situations in which elite sources<br />

are able to dominate elements of the larger social system. These powerful sources<br />

can prevent counter-elites from distributing information or marshaling organized<br />

opposition. The <strong>theory</strong> doesn’t allow for social conflict and thus can’t be applied<br />

to situations in which conflict has escalated to even moderate levels. It applies best<br />

to routine forms of information and works best when politics is reduced to marketing<br />

of competing candidate images or the transmission of innocuous public health<br />

messages.<br />

Brenda Dervin (1989) tried to develop an audience-centered social marketing<br />

<strong>theory</strong> that could serve some of its purposes while overcoming obvious limitations.<br />

She argued that campaign planners must conceive of <strong>communication</strong> as a dialogue<br />

between elite sources and various audience segments. There must be a genuine<br />

commitment to the upward flow of information and ideas from audiences even at<br />

early stages of campaigns. The purpose of campaigns should not be to induce audiences<br />

to do things that elite sources want them to do, but rather to help people<br />

learn to responsibly reconstruct their lives in ways useful to them. For example,<br />

public health campaigns shouldn’t scare people into adopting better diets but<br />

should encourage people to fundamentally reorient their lives so better eating<br />

habits become one aspect of a larger lifestyle change.<br />

Dervin’s model includes many systems <strong>theory</strong> ideas introduced in Chapter 7.<br />

It assumes that mutual interaction between sources and audiences is more effective<br />

than a source-dominated <strong>communication</strong> process. Sources will become better<br />

informed about the everyday situations faced by audiences, and audiences will<br />

gradually learn useful information for restructuring their lives. Dervin argued that<br />

elite sources should learn to respect their audiences. These audiences will then<br />

be more likely to see the wisdom of some of the things that those sources want<br />

them to do.<br />

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).<br />

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!