10.06.2013 Views

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

mass-communication-theory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 6 The Rise of Limited-Effects Theory 157<br />

Butwhatiftelevisionnews—because covering violent crime is easier, less expensive,<br />

and less threatening to the continued flow of advertising dollars than covering<br />

white-collar crime, and because violent crime, especially that committed downtown<br />

near the studio, provides better pictures than a scandal in the banking industry—<br />

were to present inner-city violence to the exclusion of most other crime? What if<br />

entertainment programmers, because of time, format, and other pressures (Gerbner,<br />

1990), continually portrayed their villains as, say, dark, mysterious, different? Do<br />

the selective processes still kick in? When the ubiquitous <strong>mass</strong> media that we routinely<br />

rely on repeatedly provide homogeneous and biased messages, where will we<br />

get the dissonant information that activates our defenses and enables us to hold onto<br />

views that are inconsistent with what we are being told? Does this situation exist in<br />

the United States today? Do most mainstream media routinely provide inherently<br />

biased messages? We will return to these and similar questions in later chapters.<br />

Today, more than sixty years after the Allport and Postman study, would the<br />

knife still find its way from the white man’s hand into the black man’s? Have the<br />

civil rights movement and television programming like The Cosby Show and<br />

That’s So Raven made a difference? Or does routine news coverage of violent<br />

crime continue to fuel our apprehensions and therefore our biases? Later chapters<br />

that deal with theories that view <strong>mass</strong> <strong>communication</strong> as more symbolically, rather<br />

than informationally, powerful will address these questions. For now, though, you<br />

can explore the issue with help from the box entitled “Drug Users: Allport and<br />

Postman Revisited.”<br />

LIMITATIONS OF THE EXPERIMENTAL PERSUASION RESEARCH<br />

Like the research approach developed by Lazarsfeld, the Yale approach had important<br />

limitations. Here we list and compare them with those described for the Lazarsfeld<br />

research.<br />

1. Experiments were conducted in laboratories or other artificial settings to<br />

control extraneous variables and manipulate independent variables. But it was<br />

often difficult to relate these results to real-life situations. Researchers made<br />

many serious errors in trying to generalize from laboratory results. Also, most<br />

experiments take place over relatively short time periods. Effects that don’t<br />

take place immediately remain unidentified. Hovland found long-term effects<br />

only because the military trainees he was studying were readily accessible for a<br />

longer period. Most researchers don’t have this luxury. Some are forced to<br />

study “captive” but atypical populations like students or prisoners.<br />

2. Experiments have the opposite problems from surveys when researchers study<br />

the immediate effects of specific media messages. As noted earlier, it is<br />

cumbersome if not impossible to study effects of specific messages using<br />

surveys. By contrast, experiments are ideally suited to studying the immediate<br />

effects of specific media content on small or homogeneous groups of people.<br />

Experiments aren’t, however, suited to studying the cumulative influence of<br />

patterns of overall media use within large heterogeneous populations.<br />

This limitation of experimental research has produced serious biases in its<br />

accumulated findings. Because the study and comparison of an individual<br />

Copyright 2010 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part. Due to electronic rights, some third party content may be suppressed from the eBook and/or eChapter(s).<br />

Editorial review has deemed that any suppressed content does not materially affect the overall learning experience. Cengage Learning reserves the right to remove additional content at any time if subsequent rights restrictions require it.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!