03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

anyone who pays the search fee. An unscrupulous investigator may also use<br />

contacts in various businesses to obtain private information, such as banking <strong>and</strong><br />

phone records. The investigator will talk to potential witnesses, persons who know<br />

the defendant, employees of the defendant (unless forbidden by state law), <strong>and</strong><br />

anyone who can provide information about the incident. If there are medical records<br />

involved, the attorney will request copies or will examine the original in person.<br />

The attorney may hire an expert to evaluate the information to determine if it<br />

supports the plaintiff’s case.<br />

b) Statute of Limitations<br />

The plaintiff has a fixed period of time to file the claim in civil cases. This is called<br />

the statute of limitations. In many states, medical malpractice cases must be filed<br />

within 2 years. Perhaps the longest statutes of limitations are in certain types of<br />

conspiracy cases. Private cases brought under the Racketeering Influenced Corrupt<br />

Organizations Act (RICO) laws can involve incidents back 10 years. Any claim<br />

filed after the statute of limitations has run will be dismissed.<br />

In many cases, the plaintiff does not know about the negligence at the time it<br />

occurs. For example, if a surgeon leaves a pair of forceps in the patient, the patient<br />

might not know about it for months or years. In other cases, the patient cannot<br />

know until some other condition occurs, such as Rh sensitization that might not<br />

show up until the patient is pregnant again. Toxic exposure cases pose the problem<br />

of whether the statute runs from when the victim was exposed, or when the disease<br />

occurs. To avoid injustice in these cases, the courts developed the discovery rule,<br />

holding that the statute of limitations would not run until the patient knew, or<br />

should have known, of the injury. [Gaither v. City Hosp., Inc., 487 S.E.2d 901 (W.<br />

Va. 1997)] Many states, however, have abolished the discovery rule as part of tort<br />

reform. In one case under these tort reform rules, a gynecologist did a PAP smear<br />

on a patient <strong>and</strong> told her she would be informed if the test was abnormal. The test<br />

did come back abnormal, but the physician’s office staff filed it without telling the<br />

physician. Four years later she had a pelvic examination <strong>and</strong> was found to have<br />

stage IIb cancer of the endocervix. The court ruled that the statute of limitations<br />

had run <strong>and</strong> the plaintiff’s complaint must be dismissed, even though there was no<br />

way for the plaintiff to have known of the negligence.<br />

3. Pretrial Settlements<br />

Many cases are settled before any legal claim is filed or a trial is held. Settlements<br />

are driven by the strength of the plaintiff’s or prosecutor’s case, the potential cost of<br />

the litigation, the possible adverse publicity from a public airing of the dispute, the<br />

potential risk of loss in court, <strong>and</strong> each party’s concern with resolving the dispute<br />

quickly. The terms of many settlements, both private <strong>and</strong> criminal, include<br />

confidentiality agreements that reduce or eliminate the defendant’s public relations<br />

problem. This can be a powerful settlement tool if the defendant will suffer from the<br />

adverse publicity even if ultimately found innocent. There are financial incentives for<br />

141

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!