03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

should be sure that she underst<strong>and</strong>s the risks. If she is the carrier, she must<br />

underst<strong>and</strong> that another father will not alter the risk. If the problem is a recessive<br />

disease with a high gene prevalence, such as sickle cell disease or cystic fibrosis,<br />

she may have the bad luck to pick a father who is also a carrier. On the other h<strong>and</strong>,<br />

if her husb<strong>and</strong> is the carrier <strong>and</strong> she is not, her idea is medically sound, if socially<br />

questionable. Although it is reasonable to try to talk a woman out of seeking a<br />

surrogate father without telling her husb<strong>and</strong>, it would violate her privacy to tell her<br />

husb<strong>and</strong>. A physician who is uncomfortable with the situation should withdraw<br />

from the case. He or she should not try to control the actions of an independent<br />

adult.<br />

c) Should We Get Married?<br />

Although this is not a medical question, it is one that a physician doing genetic<br />

counseling may be asked. The answer for a particular couple will depend on many<br />

things: How much do they want children? How great is their risk of genetic<br />

disease? How severe is the disease? What are their feelings about prenatal<br />

diagnosis <strong>and</strong> abortion? The birth of a h<strong>and</strong>icapped child is a strain on any<br />

marriage <strong>and</strong> often contributes to divorce. If there are other potential problems,<br />

such as family objections or teenage partners, then the risk of divorce is fairly high.<br />

d) Should We Get Divorced?<br />

The general underst<strong>and</strong>ing of genetic disease is not great. There are people who<br />

believe that there is a moral duty to dissolve a marriage if the parties are even<br />

distantly related or if there is genetic disease involved. One of the most widely<br />

publicized cases involved a biologic brother <strong>and</strong> sister who were adopted by<br />

different families as small children. They met in adulthood, married, <strong>and</strong> had three<br />

healthy children. Another person who knew of their earlier relationship tried to<br />

force them to divorce. They quite rightly refused.<br />

Couples should underst<strong>and</strong> the genetic problem they face <strong>and</strong> the likelihood that<br />

children will be affected. Once they underst<strong>and</strong> their options, the parties to the<br />

marriage will have to make their own choices. Whatever a physician may advise,<br />

strong marriages will tend to survive; weak ones may not, <strong>and</strong> genetic compatibility<br />

is often only a small part of the equation.<br />

e) What Should I Tell My Family?<br />

The best answer to this one is “nothing.” If a couple is considering alternative<br />

methods of conceiving a healthy child, such as artificial insemination, or if the<br />

couple is going to have prenatal diagnosis <strong>and</strong> abortion of a defective fetus, they<br />

are well advised to tell as few people as possible. If enough people are told, there is<br />

certain to be someone who will disagree with the decision out of ignorance or<br />

moral outrage. The child may also face ostracism in the family. A gr<strong>and</strong>parent who<br />

has a number of biologic gr<strong>and</strong>children may not care about a child of artificial<br />

568

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!