03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ethical obligations concerning the maintenance <strong>and</strong> confidentiality of employee<br />

medical information, the duty to disclose information to a patient/employee or any<br />

other aspect of the medical-care relationship, or affect existing legal obligations<br />

concerning the protection of trade secret information.” The rules do not pose any<br />

ethical problems beyond those already inherent in occupational medicine practice. In<br />

the case of providing access to trade secret information, they help resolve an existing<br />

ethical dilemma.<br />

2. Defining OSHA-Regulated Occupational Medicine<br />

The OSHA regulations indirectly define occupational medical practice by<br />

establishing what constitutes OSHA occupational medical information. By inference,<br />

physicians generating such regulated medical information are practicing occupational<br />

medicine as regulated by OSHA. The regulations apply to any employer “who<br />

makes, maintains, contracts for, or has access to employee … medical records …<br />

pertaining to employees exposed to toxic substances or harmful physical agents.”<br />

The rules include all medical records maintained on a covered employee—not just<br />

those m<strong>and</strong>ated by “specific occupational safety <strong>and</strong> health st<strong>and</strong>ards.” The rules<br />

specifically include records maintained by physicians who are not employees of the<br />

covered employer but provide medical services on a contractual or fee-for-service<br />

basis. There are additional regulations that require monitoring of exposure to specific<br />

toxic substances. These regulations prevent employers from avoiding the rules on<br />

employee medical records by ignoring employee health entirely.<br />

It is the definitions of exposure <strong>and</strong> toxic agents that account for the broad reach of<br />

these rules:<br />

“Exposure” or “exposed” means that an employee is subjected to a toxic<br />

substance or harmful physical agent in the course of employment through any<br />

route of entry (inhalation, ingestion, skin contact or absorption, etc.), <strong>and</strong><br />

includes past exposure <strong>and</strong> potential (e.g., accidental or possible) exposure.<br />

“Toxic substance or harmful physical agent” means any chemical substance,<br />

biological agent (bacteria, virus, fungus, etc.), or physical stress (noise, heat,<br />

cold, vibration, repetitive motion, ionizing <strong>and</strong> non- ionizing radiation, hypo-<br />

or hyperbaric pressure, etc.) which (i) Is listed in the latest printed edition of<br />

the National Institute for Occupational Safety <strong>and</strong> <strong>Health</strong> (NIOSH) Registry<br />

of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS); (ii) Has yielded positive<br />

evidence of an acute or chronic health hazard in testing conducted by, or<br />

known to, the employer; or (iii) Is the subject of a material safety data sheet<br />

kept by or known to the employer indicating that the material may pose a<br />

hazard to human health.<br />

Given that the current edition of the RTECS contains over 45,000 chemicals, it is<br />

hard to imagine an industrial employee who is not covered by these regulations. The<br />

addition of biological agents exp<strong>and</strong>s coverage to most health care workers. The<br />

inclusion of repetitive motion <strong>and</strong> nonionizing radiation adds every office worker<br />

618

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!