03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

employee’s health status.” In the absence of specific authorization by the patient,<br />

however, this provision does not give medical care providers the right to discuss<br />

the patient’s medical condition with third parties.<br />

A dem<strong>and</strong> to examine the original record should not disrupt office routines in the<br />

individual case, but it can become a problem when a designated representative<br />

requests access to the records of all the employees of a company. The physician or<br />

clinic is required to provide proper facilities for reviewing the records, which can<br />

take weeks or months, or to loan the records to the requesting organization. In<br />

either case, the physician or clinic may find it necessary to make <strong>and</strong> retain a copy<br />

of the records to provide ongoing care for the employees during the period when<br />

the records are unavailable. This can be very expensive <strong>and</strong> should be addressed in<br />

the contract between a company <strong>and</strong> a contract provider of occupational medical<br />

services.<br />

Whenever an employee or designated representative requests a copy of a record,<br />

the employer (or contracting occupational medicine provider) must provide a copy<br />

of the record without charge, provide free access to a copying machine, or loan the<br />

record to the requesting employee or representative for a reasonable period of time<br />

to allow copying. “In the case of an original X-ray, the employer may restrict<br />

access to on-site examination or make other suitable arrangements for the<br />

temporary loan of the X- ray.” If the record has been previously provided without<br />

cost to an employee or designated representative, the employer may charge<br />

reasonable, nondiscriminatory administrative costs (search <strong>and</strong> copying expenses<br />

but not including overhead expenses) for additional copies of the record. The<br />

employer shall not charge for an initial request for a copy of information that has<br />

been added to a record since it was previously provided.<br />

c) Limitations on Access to <strong>Medical</strong> Records<br />

When an employee requests access to his or her medical records, the physician may<br />

recommend that the employee discuss the records with the physician, accept a<br />

summary of material facts <strong>and</strong> opinions in lieu of the records requested, or accept<br />

release of the requested records only to a physician or other designated<br />

representative. If the employee persists in his or her request to see the complete<br />

record, the rules provide that release may be made to a designated representative<br />

rather than to the employee:<br />

Whenever an employee requests access to his or her employee medical<br />

records, <strong>and</strong> a physician representing the employer believes that direct<br />

employee access to information contained in the records regarding a<br />

specific diagnosis of a terminal illness or a psychiatric condition could be<br />

detrimental to the employee’s health, the employer may inform the<br />

employee that access will only be provided to a designated representative<br />

of the employee having specific written consent, <strong>and</strong> deny the employee’s<br />

request for direct access to this information only. Where a designated<br />

representative with specific written consent requests access to information<br />

622

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!