03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

collective action, a close reading indicates no change from prevailing antitrust rules.<br />

The only safety zones provided in the guidelines are for physician networks that<br />

involve significant shared financial risk <strong>and</strong> that do not have more than 20% of the<br />

market for exclusive arrangements, or 30% for nonexclusive arrangements. Although<br />

the guidelines say that it is possible to have complying networks without substantial<br />

shared financial risk, the criteria they use for evaluating these networks imply that it<br />

is unlikely many will pass. The guidelines make clear that informal associations of<br />

physicians that engage in anticompetitive activities, such as boycotts of MCOs or<br />

other bargaining activities, will be treated harshly:<br />

In contrast to integrated physician network joint ventures, such as these<br />

discussed above, there have been arrangements among physicians that have<br />

taken the form of networks, but which in purpose or effect were little more<br />

than efforts by their participants to prevent or impede competitive forces<br />

from operating in the market. These arrangements are not likely to produce<br />

significant procompetitive efficiencies. Such arrangements have been, <strong>and</strong><br />

will continue to be, treated as unlawful conspiracies or cartels, whose price<br />

agreements are per se illegal. [Id. at B(1).]<br />

I. References - Team Care<br />

1. Managed Care<br />

Afflitto L. Managed care <strong>and</strong> its influence on physician–patient relationship—<br />

implications for collaborative practice. Plast Surg Nurs. 1997;17:217–218.<br />

Appelbaum PS. Managed care <strong>and</strong> the next generation of mental health law. New<br />

Directions Ment <strong>Health</strong> Serv. 1996:65–69.<br />

Barratt K. Reviewing gag clauses in managed care contracts. Wisc Med J.<br />

1996;95:249–250.<br />

Beinecke R, Pfeifer R, Pfeiffer D, Soussou N. The evaluation of fee for service <strong>and</strong><br />

managed care from the viewpoint of people with disabilities in the USA. Disabil<br />

Rehabil. 1997;19:513–522.<br />

Bettman JW, Demorest BH, Craven ER. Risk management issues in the new<br />

managed care environment. Survey Ophthalmol. 1996;41:268–270.<br />

Bitterman RA. Managed care authorization for emergency department services: a<br />

medical risk to patients, a legal risk for doctors <strong>and</strong> hospitals. NC Med J.<br />

1997;58:260–263.<br />

Boyd JW. The human toll of managed care. Pharos. 1997;60:32–34.<br />

Brody BA. Ethical issues raised by managed care. Tex Med. 1997;93:43–45.<br />

Brody H, Bonham VL Jr. Gag rules <strong>and</strong> trade secrets in managed care contracts:<br />

428

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!