03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

accepted as evidence, the person making that statement cannot be cross-examined<br />

about the truthfulness of it. The court dem<strong>and</strong>s that the person who actually made the<br />

statement be brought into the courtroom, placed under oath, <strong>and</strong> asked to repeat the<br />

statement.<br />

If this rule were applied to the medical record, everyone who made an entry in the<br />

record would have to be called into the courtroom <strong>and</strong> asked which entries they<br />

made, why they made them, <strong>and</strong> what information they based these entries upon—an<br />

extremely time-consuming process <strong>and</strong> maybe even impossible. Because of these<br />

practical difficulties, the courts have created the business records exception to the<br />

hearsay rule: documents may be admitted into evidence without the requirement that<br />

the persons who made the entries be available for cross- examination.<br />

5. Business Records Exception to Hearsay<br />

Documents are subject to cross-examination under the hearsay rule. Most documents<br />

are hearsay because they record what others did <strong>and</strong> said, <strong>and</strong> are generally<br />

maintained by someone who was not involved in matters in the records. There is an<br />

exception to the hearsay rules for business records. For medical care practitioners,<br />

the medical record is the key business record. <strong>Medical</strong> recordkeeping procedures<br />

must fulfill the legal requirements of the business records exception if a medical<br />

record is to be admissible in court. This exception to the hearsay rule requires that<br />

the record meet four basic tests:<br />

1. The record was made in the regular course of the business.<br />

2. The entry in the record was made by an employee or representative of that<br />

business who had personal knowledge of the act, event, or condition that is being<br />

recorded in the record.<br />

3. The record was made at or near the time that the recorded act, event, or condition<br />

occurred, or reasonably soon thereafter.<br />

4. The records were kept in a consistent manner, according to a set procedure.<br />

a) Entry in the Regular Course of Business<br />

The first requirement is that the entry be made in the regular course of business. For<br />

a physician, the regular course of business is providing medical care, keeping<br />

medical records, <strong>and</strong> complying with state <strong>and</strong> federal health laws. The medical<br />

record will be admissible to prove the truth of activities related to the practice of<br />

medicine. Entries in the medical record that do not deal with the practice of<br />

medicine will not be considered to have been made in the regular course of<br />

business.<br />

For example, if a patient seeks medical care after being involved in an automobile<br />

accident, the patient’s physical condition, as described in the medical records, will<br />

be admissible as evidence in a legal proceeding. However, if the physician also<br />

155

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!