03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

lifesaving care. Many physicians ignore the refusal on the basis that the woman will<br />

change her mind if the section becomes necessary or in the hope that a section will<br />

not be required. This is a dangerous approach if an emergency section becomes<br />

necessary. Since there will be no time to obtain a court order, the physician must<br />

choose between respecting the woman’s wishes or operating against her consent.<br />

Irrespective of the patient’s expressed wishes, it will be difficult to defend allowing<br />

the patient <strong>and</strong> baby to die. The best that can be expected is a verdict based on the<br />

court’s requiring the enforcement of a rigorously documented informed refusal of<br />

care. Conversely, operating against a patient’s express refusal, without judicial<br />

authorization, is legally <strong>and</strong> ethically unacceptable.<br />

G. Home Deliveries<br />

There is little legal experience with home deliveries because very few home deliveries<br />

in the United States are attended or supervised by physicians. Although there is a<br />

small, visible group of middle-class <strong>and</strong> affluent women seeking home deliveries, most<br />

women delivered at home are poor <strong>and</strong> would prefer to be delivered in a hospital by a<br />

physician. Once these women are in labor, they can be brought into the hospital under<br />

the antidumping provisions of the Medicare/Medicaid laws, but they will still be<br />

responsible for their medical bills. These poor women pose a dilemma for physicians<br />

because of the conflict between their desire to help the woman avoid the hospital costs<br />

<strong>and</strong> the ethical <strong>and</strong> legal problems in engaging in potentially subst<strong>and</strong>ard care.<br />

1. The Politics of Home Deliveries<br />

Women who choose home deliveries because of political beliefs or involvement in<br />

quasi- religious antimedical groups are problematic because they usually have high<br />

expectations. Many believe that by avoiding the medicalization of birth, they will<br />

have a unique experience <strong>and</strong> a perfect baby. Physicians who might otherwise<br />

consider supervising a home delivery should be very cautious when working with a<br />

patient who has such unrealistic beliefs. The greatest threats posed by such patients<br />

are the refusal of necessary hospitalization should an emergency arise <strong>and</strong> the delay<br />

in getting hospital care once the patient agrees.<br />

Even if the physician has discussed this possibility <strong>and</strong> documented the patient’s<br />

agreement to hospitalization in the birth plan, the patient retains the right to refuse a<br />

transfer to the hospital. This can put the physician in the ethical <strong>and</strong> legal bind of a<br />

patient’s refusing emergency medical care that is necessary to preserve her <strong>and</strong> her<br />

baby’s health. There is no time for a court order for care, <strong>and</strong>, unlike the usual<br />

situation where the patient is in the emergency room, the patient must be transported<br />

against her will to make the care possible.<br />

2. Participating in Home Deliveries<br />

As long as a home delivery is successful, the physician is not at any special legal<br />

risk. If the mother or the baby is injured because of a complication that could have<br />

588

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!