03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

such as IV (intravenous) solutions or disposable needles it can be cheap insurance<br />

to pay a few cents more for an item from an established manufacturer. Even if the<br />

two products are equally good, it is to the hospital’s benefit to have a responsible<br />

party to sue if there is a defect.<br />

J. Conclusions<br />

<strong>Medical</strong> care practitioners must underst<strong>and</strong> basic medical care law to practice in the<br />

modern medical care environment. <strong>Medical</strong> care practitioners do not need to become<br />

lawyers, but they need to be able to recognize legal problems <strong>and</strong> triage them into<br />

those that they can manage themselves, those that need more detailed legal advice, <strong>and</strong><br />

those that constitute legal emergencies. <strong>Law</strong> must be part of the routine practice of<br />

medical care delivery, not just something that the lawyers do. <strong>Medical</strong> care<br />

practitioners need to practice in ways that are consistent with their legal <strong>and</strong> ethical<br />

duties, <strong>and</strong> they need to create a culture that encourages others to do the same.<br />

K. References - <strong>Law</strong>yering<br />

Bahner TM, Gallion ML. Waiver of attorney–client privilege via issue injection: a call<br />

for uniformity. Defense Counsel J. 1998;65:199–207.<br />

Ball FR. Corporate clients <strong>and</strong> the attorney–client privilege in Illinois state <strong>and</strong> federal<br />

courts. Ill Bar J. 1998;86:426–430.<br />

Burman JM. The attorney work product privilege. Wyo <strong>Law</strong>yer. 1996;19:15–17.<br />

Cerven JM. Court extends attorney–client privilege to psychiatrist-client<br />

communications. Ill State Bar Assoc. 1995;83:598–600.<br />

Dunson KC. I. The attorney–client privilege. J Legal Prof. 1996;20:231–238.<br />

Flaming TH. Internet e-mail <strong>and</strong> the attorney–client privilege. Ill State Bar Assoc.<br />

1997;85:183–184.<br />

Floyd DH. A “delicate <strong>and</strong> difficult task”: balancing the competing interests of federal<br />

rule of evidence 612, the work product doctrine, <strong>and</strong> the attorney–client privilege.<br />

Buffalo <strong>Law</strong> Rev. 1996;44:101–138.<br />

Gruber HM. E-Mail: the attorney–client privilege applied. George Washington <strong>Law</strong><br />

Rev. 1998;66:625–656.<br />

Hardgrove JA. Scope of waiver of attorney–client privilege: articulating a st<strong>and</strong>ard that<br />

will afford guidance to courts. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois.<br />

1998;1998:643–681.<br />

Hellerstein AK. A comprehensive survey of the attorney–client privilege <strong>and</strong> work<br />

product doctrine. Practising <strong>Law</strong> Inst. 1996;540:589.<br />

Higgason RW. The attorney–client privilege in joint defense <strong>and</strong> common interest<br />

215

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!