03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

workplace, their legal status is not well defined.<br />

Immunosuppressed individuals are disabled under the federal law <strong>and</strong> are entitled to<br />

work if they meet the other requirements of the law. If a secondary infection such as<br />

active tuberculosis threatens other workers or third parties, the infected person may<br />

be removed from the workplace. The difficult question is whether<br />

immunosuppressed persons may be denied employment to protect them from<br />

workplace-acquired infections. It is argued that the worker has the right to accept<br />

the risk of infection. Workers’ compensation laws, however, do not allow the<br />

worker to accept the financial risk of workplace injury. The employer must pay for<br />

the costs of treatment or disability if the immunosuppressed worker becomes<br />

infected in the workplace, irrespective of the employee’s assumption of the risk of<br />

infection.<br />

2. The Legal Risks of Communicable Diseases<br />

Communicable diseases in the workplace pose three classes of risk: (1) workers’<br />

compensation liability, (2) third-party liability, <strong>and</strong> (3) productivity losses. All three<br />

are potentially very expensive, yet have been accorded scant attention from<br />

employers or employees. The HIV epidemic has sensitized employees <strong>and</strong> employers<br />

to the problems of workplace-acquired infections. As declining health insurance<br />

coverage forces more persons to seek compensation through the courts for illness,<br />

workers’ compensation claims for workplace- acquired infections will increase.<br />

Workers’ compensation laws are not limited to accidents or occupational illnesses;<br />

they cover all illnesses <strong>and</strong> injuries acquired in the workplace, including<br />

communicable diseases <strong>and</strong> intentional injuries such as rape. The employee is<br />

entitled to the cost of medical care, disability, <strong>and</strong> lost time for work. In return, the<br />

law prevents the employee from suing the employer for the more extensive damages<br />

available in tort litigation. This exemption is important because some usually mild<br />

diseases can cause serious injuries in adults. Mumps can cause sterility, measles<br />

sometimes kills, chicken pox can cause brain injury, <strong>and</strong> tuberculosis can require<br />

long-term treatment.<br />

Earlier in this century, it was common for employees to claim compensation for<br />

communicable diseases such as typhoid caught from the company water supply. As<br />

the public awareness of communicable diseases diminished, claims for workplace-<br />

acquired infections decreased. Even medical care workers, who have a high rate of<br />

morbidity from workplace infections, have tended to rely on group health coverage<br />

for workplace- acquired infections rather than workers’ compensation. Progressive<br />

reductions in group health coverage <strong>and</strong> reduced job security are causing workers to<br />

seek workers’ compensation for illnesses that in the past would not have resulted in<br />

compensation claims. This will require physicians to be more sensitive to the<br />

epidemiology of workplace-acquired infections.<br />

a) Third-Party Liability<br />

652

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!