03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

person is paid, this is only one of several factors that are considered. Even unpaid<br />

volunteer workers may be classified as employees for the purpose of vicarious<br />

liability. The usual focus is on payment because most disputes about employment<br />

status involve the tax laws rather than the tort laws. The whole work situation is<br />

considered when determining whether there is vicarious liability for a person’s<br />

actions.<br />

2. Method of Payment<br />

Persons who are paid as employees (the employer pays federal or state withholding<br />

tax, Federal Insurance Contributors Act [FICA], insurance, <strong>and</strong> so on) will generally<br />

be considered employees for determining vicarious liability. If the worker is a<br />

volunteer who receives no pay but does a defined job that is usually done by paid<br />

employees, the volunteer is also treated as an employee. If FICA should be paid but<br />

is not because the employee <strong>and</strong> the employer are trying to evade their tax liabilities,<br />

the court can still find the putative employer vicariously liable for the person’s<br />

actions. In addition, the employer may have liability for tax evasion. The Internal<br />

Revenue Service has become intolerant of paying an individual as a contract worker<br />

to avoid employment taxes <strong>and</strong> FICA. If the worker is truly a contract worker, is a<br />

volunteer who is not displacing a paid worker, or is paid by someone else, then<br />

vicarious liability is determined by the extent to which the individuals control their<br />

own work.<br />

3. Control<br />

The fundamental issue that determines whether a person is legally treated as an<br />

employee is the extent to which the person hiring the work may control the details of<br />

the work. To illustrate this, consider the situation of hiring a licensed plumber to<br />

install a new sink in a physician’s office. In this situation, the physician determines<br />

what type of sink to install <strong>and</strong> where to put it, but the plumber determines how to<br />

install the sink. If someone is injured because the sink is improperly installed, the<br />

physician is not vicariously liable for the plumber’s work.<br />

Conversely, assume that the physician hires an unskilled worker to install the sink.<br />

The physician tells the worker how to cut the hole for the sink, attach the pipes, <strong>and</strong><br />

install the garbage disposal. In this situation, the physician would be vicariously<br />

liable for an injury caused by the unskilled worker’s negligent installation of the sink.<br />

There will be vicarious liability when the employer directs the details of the work or<br />

has the responsibility for directing the details of the work.<br />

4. Scope of Employment<br />

An employee’s scope of employment is the activities that the employee may properly<br />

carry out <strong>and</strong> that the employer is expected to supervise. Determining scope of<br />

employment is important because an employee can collect workers’ compensation<br />

benefits only for injuries that arise within the scope of employment. It is also<br />

397

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!