03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>and</strong> the attorney to recognize when they need to take action to protect the client’s<br />

legal health.<br />

4. Remedying Problems<br />

The client may make an informed choice <strong>and</strong> decide not to remedy all of the legal<br />

problems that are detected, just as a patient may make an informed choice to forgo<br />

treatment for conditions detected in a general history <strong>and</strong> physical. However, once a<br />

legal problem has been identified, it becomes more dangerous to ignore. Conduct<br />

that was negligent when done unknowingly becomes intentional or reckless once the<br />

physician is notified that the behavior is questionable. This does not mean that<br />

ignorance is defensible. <strong>Medical</strong> care practitioners who violate the law can be<br />

prosecuted irrespective of whether they know the specifics of the law that they break.<br />

The constitutional requirement is that the law be specific enough to define illegal<br />

behavior clearly, not that defendants personally know they are breaking the law.<br />

I. Confidentiality <strong>and</strong> Legal Privilege<br />

There is a strong public policy to encourage people <strong>and</strong> institutions to seek legal<br />

advice. In civil <strong>and</strong> regulatory matters it is assumed that legal advice will encourage<br />

them to be more law abiding. In criminal matters there is a constitutional right to<br />

counsel <strong>and</strong> any undue restrictions on the attorney–client relationship would violate<br />

that right. It is assumed that clients cannot work effectively with counsel unless their<br />

confidences are protected. Ten years ago, discussions of legal privilege in medical care<br />

were centered around discovery of hospital incident reports <strong>and</strong> peer review records in<br />

civil litigation. While these are still significant issues, federal <strong>and</strong> state criminal<br />

prosecutions for health care fraud have made medical care practitioners much more<br />

concerned with legal privilege as related to business records <strong>and</strong> compliance audits.<br />

There are two types of legal privilege: the attorney–client communication privilege,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the attorney work product privilege. These provide varying amounts of protection,<br />

but they do not automatically attach just because an attorney is involved with a<br />

transaction. They depend on both the client’s behavior <strong>and</strong> whether the attorney is<br />

acting as independent legal counsel.<br />

1. Attorney Independence<br />

Attorney independence is usually not an issue for attorneys in private practice<br />

representing clients in traditional litigation or transaction practice, unless the attorney<br />

is in business with the client, or becomes a participant in the client’s wrongdoing.<br />

There is no protection if the court determines that the attorney–client relationship<br />

was a sham to conceal illegal activities involving the attorney. There has already<br />

been one case in which medical care attorneys were indicted, along with their clients,<br />

for materially participating in the clients’ alleged scheme to defraud the federal<br />

government. The physicians were accused of taking kickbacks to steer nursing home<br />

patients needing hospital care to hospitals that paid the physicians’ bribes. These<br />

209

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!