03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

turning away such a case. However, this is not an excuse for ignoring the state’s laws<br />

on choosing workers’ compensation care providers.<br />

It is common practice for the hospital to contact the insurance company to get<br />

permission to treat a patient, so that the insurance will cover the bill. In real<br />

emergencies this is done after the treatment is started. For the patients with an<br />

earache or a cough, it is usually done first. Particularly in managed care plans, the<br />

insurer may direct the patient to another hospital or to an office the next day. If there<br />

is no medical reason why the patient cannot wait, this is legal <strong>and</strong> acceptable<br />

practice. The patient may choose to pay cash <strong>and</strong> receive treatment there or they may<br />

go where their insurance will pay the bill.<br />

Work-related injuries should be treated the same way in an emergency room. Federal<br />

law requires medical triage. If the illness or injury is a true emergency, treatment<br />

should be rendered immediately <strong>and</strong> the employer contacted later. If the hospital has<br />

a formal or informal agreement with the specific employer to provide workers’<br />

compensation care, then this should be adequate. If the patient does not have a life-<br />

or limb-threatening emergency <strong>and</strong> the hospital does not have an agreement with the<br />

employer, then the employer should be contacted before care is given, subject to the<br />

requirements of EMTALA. In any state, the patient may choose to pay cash for the<br />

visit <strong>and</strong> argue it out with the workers’ compensation insurance system later. And, in<br />

some states, it is unwise to ignore the requirement to notify the employer unless you<br />

are thoroughly familiar with the state <strong>and</strong> federal laws.<br />

In a doctor’s office when providing routine care, there is no justification for ignoring<br />

the employer. If the employee is claiming a work-related injury <strong>and</strong> he or she wants<br />

workers’ compensation to pay for it, the employer has a legal right to the employee’s<br />

relevant medical information. The doctor should be prepared to work with both the<br />

patient <strong>and</strong> the employer or should not be practicing occupational medicine.<br />

4. Reporting<br />

Many states require reporting of certain types of occupational illnesses <strong>and</strong> injuries<br />

to the health department just like communicable diseases. As with other public health<br />

reports, the medical care provider has a personal duty to make the report regardless<br />

of who else may be reporting. Generally, OSHA reporting by a physician or hospital<br />

is optional. However, OSHA may be the best source of information for patient care<br />

<strong>and</strong> they may be the most appropriate agency to do an investigation.<br />

C. Records<br />

Providers who care for work-related injuries must know the laws on recordkeeping in<br />

their state. These records are not always confidential like personal medical records.<br />

There is a long list of people who have statutory access to workers’ compensation or<br />

OSHA records. At a minimum, the patient, the employer, <strong>and</strong> the workers’<br />

compensation insurance company have access to the records on the specific injury. In<br />

some states, the health department or other state agency also has statutory access.<br />

615

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!