03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

c) The Goldberg Rights<br />

Persons whose rights are at issue in an administrative proceeding do have due<br />

process protections, depending on the rights at issue. The leading case involved<br />

welfare beneficiaries whose benefits under the Aid to Families with Dependent<br />

Children program were terminated. The U.S. Supreme Court held that they were<br />

entitled to a hearing <strong>and</strong> certain due process rights:<br />

1. the right to present an oral case<br />

2. the right to confront witnesses<br />

3. the right to be represented by an attorney, although the court did not create a<br />

right to appointed counsel<br />

4. the right to have the decision based on the record before the ALJ<br />

These are known as the Goldberg rights, after the case that established them.<br />

[Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 (1970)] The availability of the Goldberg rights<br />

depends on the nature of the private interest that is threatened, the probability of an<br />

erroneous decision, the potential value of the evidence, <strong>and</strong> the cost to the<br />

government. These are important to medical care practitioners in proceedings such<br />

as license revocation hearings <strong>and</strong> other proceedings where the practitioner’s<br />

livelihood is at issue.<br />

d) The ALJ’s Decision<br />

The ALJ questions witnesses, the agency staff, <strong>and</strong> the outside parties. The ALJ<br />

role is to ensure that a full <strong>and</strong> balanced record is developed to aid in making his or<br />

her decision, <strong>and</strong> for the agency to use in the review of the ALJ’s decision. When<br />

the proceeding is completed, the ALJ makes a decision <strong>and</strong> that becomes part of<br />

the record. Unlike the decision of a judge in a court proceeding, the ALJ’s decision<br />

is not final. It is legally only a recommendation to the agency director as to the best<br />

way to proceed. In most cases the agency will adopt the ALJ’s recommendation,<br />

but it is not bound to. In federal agencies, the head of the agency is free to come to<br />

a different conclusion, based on the record, <strong>and</strong> to make a final agency rule that is<br />

different from that of the ALJ. In some circumstances the agency provides an<br />

internal appeal procedure for ALJ determinations. In some states the administrative<br />

hearing process is done outside of the agency <strong>and</strong> the ALJ’s decision is final. There<br />

are procedures for appealing agency decisions in the courts.<br />

e) Informal Agency Action<br />

The vast majority of agency actions are done informally. For example, every claim<br />

for payment for medical treatment rendered to a Medicare patient requires agency<br />

action. There must be a determination that the care was rendered by a provider<br />

entitled to payment, that the care was necessary <strong>and</strong> proper, <strong>and</strong> the amount that<br />

182

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!