03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

drug. The trial is a success <strong>and</strong> the drug company is applying to the FDA for a<br />

license to market the drug. This permit, as described in the FDA section, requires<br />

the FDA to review the clinical trial data to assure that the drug is safe <strong>and</strong> effective.<br />

If your data has to be removed from the clinical database, it will could make the<br />

necessary analysis impossible <strong>and</strong> keep the drug from being approved.<br />

c) Preventing Unauthorized Release<br />

A physician has a duty to ensure that information is released only to properly<br />

authorized individuals. Assume, for example, that a patient has signed an<br />

authorization to release information to an employer. The medical care practitioner<br />

can legally release information to the employer, but he or she must ensure that the<br />

person requesting the information is the one authorized to have it. This might<br />

require that the information be sent to the personnel department rather than be<br />

given to a caller on the telephone.<br />

If someone presents an authorization that the patient has signed, the medical care<br />

practitioner should endeavor to determine if the release is valid. If the release is<br />

over a few months old or appears irregular, the medical care practitioner should<br />

attempt to contact the patient before releasing the information. If the patient cannot<br />

be located, the medical care practitioner should contact the person seeking the<br />

information <strong>and</strong> try to verify the authenticity of the release. If the medical care<br />

practitioner is still suspicious, he or she should request that the person seeking the<br />

information have the patient contact the office. <strong>Medical</strong> care practitioners should<br />

also be wary of subpoenas. In many states, these can be issued without supervision<br />

by a judge, <strong>and</strong> they are very easy to forge. The medical care practitioner should<br />

insist on a signed release from the patient, <strong>and</strong> should call the law office listed on<br />

the subpoena to assure that the subpoena is valid. The best policy is to have the<br />

office staff contact the patient <strong>and</strong> tell them about the subpoena before turning over<br />

the records.<br />

A physician has a right to charge a nominal fee for a copy of the patient’s medical<br />

record. This fee should reflect the actual charge for copying the chart. If the patient<br />

is indigent, the physician should provide the chart or an appropriate summary at no<br />

cost. Under no circumstances should the physician attempt to hold the chart hostage<br />

for an unpaid medical fee or to prevent the patient from seeking care elsewhere.<br />

This is bad public relations <strong>and</strong> may cause the patient to sue to obtain the record.<br />

4. When Can PHI Be Released without Authorization?<br />

The major exception to the need for specific authorization for the release of PHI is<br />

that medical care providers may release information to other providers <strong>and</strong> entities<br />

who are participating in the patient's care, <strong>and</strong> to business that provide services for<br />

those providers. Physicians do not need a specific authorization to share information<br />

with specialty consultants they talk to, with labs performing medical testing, or with<br />

a billing service who prepares the physicians' bills. These business that provide<br />

355

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!