03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

eligion or conscience. Thus, he cannot claim freedom from compulsory<br />

vaccination for the child more than for himself on religious grounds. The<br />

right to practice religion freely does not include liberty to expose the<br />

community or the child to communicable disease or the latter to ill health or<br />

death.<br />

Despite the clear language of the U.S. Supreme Court, nearly all state immunization<br />

laws provide an exemption for persons with religious objections to immunization.<br />

This creates a large loophole because the Constitution will not allow laws that favor<br />

one religion over another. Christian Scientists are exempt if they choose to be, but so<br />

are individuals who have their own unique religious beliefs. If a state provides a<br />

religious exemption, the state may not question the validity of the religious beliefs of<br />

those who invoke the exception.<br />

State compulsory immunization laws contain these exemptions because few<br />

legislators underst<strong>and</strong> the public health <strong>and</strong> safety implications of immunization. No<br />

states exempt religious groups from child abuse laws or other criminal laws intended<br />

to protect either children or the general public. Physicians should make a concerted<br />

effort to educate their legislators to the risks of allowing children to remain<br />

unimmunized.<br />

3. Consent for Immunizations<br />

All states require that children be immunized for certain diseases before entering<br />

school. Since school attendance is m<strong>and</strong>atory, the law makes immunization<br />

m<strong>and</strong>atory. Philosophically, it is absurd to speak of informed consent to a m<strong>and</strong>atory<br />

treatment. Nonetheless, physicians are expected to obtain informed consent for these<br />

immunizations. There is only one acceptable way to obtain this consent: using the<br />

federally promulgated vaccine information pamphlets. [Goldsmith MF. Vaccine<br />

information pamphlets here but some physicians react strongly. JAMA.<br />

1992;267:2005– 2007.] These are often referred to as the Important Information<br />

Forms because of their introductory header. They are available from the vaccine<br />

distributors, state health departments, <strong>and</strong> the CDC. The forms have a section to<br />

document the consent, including the manufacturer <strong>and</strong> lot number for the biological,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the date of the immunization. Although not part of the m<strong>and</strong>atory information, it<br />

is also useful to record the name of the person administering the immunization.<br />

It is imperative that every patient or person authorizing the immunization (parent or<br />

guardian) be given the information in the federal form <strong>and</strong> a copy to keep. The<br />

consent can be further documented in a more conventional immunization record such<br />

as those provided by the World <strong>Health</strong> Organization. These formal immunization<br />

records are useful to show that the child’s immunization status is current.<br />

4. <strong>Medical</strong> Exemptions<br />

All state immunization laws contain an exemption for individuals with medical<br />

contraindications to immunization. It is beyond the scope of this book to list all<br />

476

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!