03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

covered in signs that ask women if they might be pregnant. Many internists, however,<br />

do not ask a woman about pregnancy <strong>and</strong> contraception before prescribing a drug that<br />

is not accepted for use in pregnancy. The risks, both medical <strong>and</strong> legal, are much<br />

greater for some drugs than they are for a chest X ray.<br />

On the other h<strong>and</strong>, there is no laboratory test that can establish pregnancy beyond<br />

doubt. A physician should never tell a woman that she is or is not pregnant on the basis<br />

of a laboratory test alone. A history <strong>and</strong> physical examination are as necessary to<br />

making this diagnosis as any other. A patient who is assured that she is not pregnant<br />

may expose herself to agents that can harm her fetus. Even if there are no expected<br />

problems, failure to diagnose the pregnancy can interfere with the patient’s receiving<br />

proper prenatal care <strong>and</strong> will reduce her options about abortion or prenatal diagnosis.<br />

1. Maternal Disease<br />

Pregnant women should be tested for diseases that directly affect their health <strong>and</strong><br />

thus secondarily affect the outcome of the pregnancy. Some of these tests are<br />

m<strong>and</strong>ated by law or public health regulation. Others are widely accepted as the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard of care. Failing to diagnose or manage maternal illness properly is a major<br />

source of liability in obstetrics. The problem arises because most pregnant women<br />

are healthy. This makes it easy to attribute what would otherwise be symptomatic<br />

illness to the normal effects of pregnancy.<br />

Once the tests are done, the physician must be very careful to evaluate the results in<br />

every patient <strong>and</strong> take action when necessary. In caring for a pregnant woman, a few<br />

days can make a tremendous difference in the outcome, so a physician should pay<br />

particular attention to the timely evaluation of test results. If a result has not been<br />

received, it should be treated as bad news until the result is available. If the syphilis<br />

serology or the blood type has been lost, it should be repeated promptly. The only<br />

true negative screening test is the one that has been reported by the laboratory <strong>and</strong><br />

evaluated by the physician.<br />

Tests should never be ordered simply as a defensive measure. It is legally more<br />

dangerous not to act on a test that indicates maternal illness than not to do the test.<br />

For example, if a patient has a negative rubella titer, her physician should be<br />

concerned if she develops a rash. What may be dismissed as an allergy in an immune<br />

patient should be worked up in a woman who may have rubella. In addition, this<br />

patient should be immunized as soon as she delivers. The obstetrician who failed to<br />

immunize a patient after her first pregnancy may be liable for a congenital rubella<br />

baby from her second pregnancy.<br />

2. Legally M<strong>and</strong>ated Testing<br />

Although congenital rubella has almost been conquered, the risk of congenital<br />

infection with herpes, hepatitis, syphilis, or HIV is increasing. [ACOG Technical<br />

Bulletin 114. Perinatal Viral <strong>and</strong> Parasitic Infections. March 1988.] The laws<br />

requiring the reporting of such infections should be carefully followed to allow<br />

584

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!