03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

traditional sense. Fetal heart monitors perform accurately <strong>and</strong> reliably within the<br />

constraints of what they measure. Devices that are unreliable or otherwise directly<br />

dangerous to patients will be the target of primary litigation against the device<br />

manufacturer. Pure secondary liability is an issue for otherwise safe <strong>and</strong> well-<br />

engineered devices. Secondary liability becomes a problem when the device in<br />

question documents previously undocumented behavior indicating negligence on the<br />

part of the medical care providers, records data with ambiguous interpretations,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or inappropriately leads to changes in medical care supervision, staffing, or<br />

patient contact because of reliance on the device.<br />

a) Filtering Data<br />

The first problem, documentation of previously undocumented behavior, is<br />

common to all recording instruments. <strong>Medical</strong> record systems that depend on<br />

people to record events, either on paper or computer, are highly filtered.<br />

Sometimes this filtering is conscious <strong>and</strong> intentional, as when personnel attempt to<br />

cover up an error by not entering incriminating information into the medical chart.<br />

In the worst case, there may even be attempts to change previous entries. This<br />

intentional distortion of data, however, is assumed to be relatively infrequent. Most<br />

commonly the filtering is unconscious <strong>and</strong> unintentional. It may occur because the<br />

recorder’s memory fades between rendering the care or making the observations<br />

<strong>and</strong> recording them in the medical record. In many situations, it occurs because the<br />

nurses do not make their primary entries into the medical record.<br />

While generally discouraged by protocols on medical records management, off-<br />

chart records are commonly used by nurses to keep track of things to do,<br />

medications given, <strong>and</strong> patient observations. These temporary records allow the<br />

nurses to batch- enter data into medical records rather than keep contemporaneous<br />

records. This allows two stages of filtering: first the information is compressed into<br />

a minimal temporary record, <strong>and</strong> then that minimal record is exp<strong>and</strong>ed into the<br />

permanent chart record. Such filtering makes it easy to transform an item<br />

accidentally from the to-do list to the done list without the task’s actually being<br />

performed. It also gives the filter an extra chance to remove nonconforming<br />

information.<br />

Filters are defined by what they exclude. Human clinical filters tend to exclude<br />

things that do not easily fit into the expectations associated with the care of a given<br />

patient. This should not be seen as an act of deception or even of carelessness. It is<br />

more a smoothing of data that tends to obscure anomalies. The smoothing is aided<br />

by the limited amount of information that can be recorded by periodic observations<br />

recorded in essentially narrative format. The end result of this process of smoothing<br />

<strong>and</strong> filtering is a medical record that is more often characterized by what it does not<br />

contain than by what it does document. This is borne out in litigation where records<br />

are usually incriminating because they fail to record what was allegedly done.<br />

52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!