03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction<br />

The core of the physician–patient relationship is the exercise of medical<br />

judgment.<br />

Consultants also have a legal relationship with patients.<br />

Good Samaritan laws protect physicians who stop at accidents.<br />

Contracts with health plans restrict the medical care practitioner’s right to choose<br />

the patients they will treat.<br />

The basic legal relationship in medicine is between the physician <strong>and</strong> the patient.<br />

Although recognizing that there are many nonphysicians delivering medical care<br />

services, the courts <strong>and</strong> the legislatures still use the physician–patient relationship as the<br />

paradigm for the legal rights <strong>and</strong> responsibilities that flow between medical care<br />

practitioners <strong>and</strong> patients. At this point in time, it is unclear how much of the law<br />

developed for the physician–patient relationship will be applied to other medical care<br />

practitioners. Some duties, such as the duty to protect the patient’s confidence, clearly<br />

apply to everyone who provides medical services. Some do not—the courts have not<br />

applied the “learned intermediary” doctrine to nurses. [Mazur v. Merck & Co., 964 F.2d<br />

1348 (3d Cir. [Pa.] 1992).] Until the courts rule on more cases involving the legal<br />

relationship between nonphysician medical care practitioners <strong>and</strong> patients, it is difficult<br />

to predict which direction the law will go.<br />

A. Managed Care <strong>and</strong> the Professional Relationship<br />

This section deals with traditional physician– patient relationship law. The core legal<br />

assumption about the physician–patient relationship is that it is a fiduciary relationship.<br />

The law expects physicians to put their patients’ financial <strong>and</strong> other interests first.<br />

Managed care is dramatically changing the nature of the physician–patient relationship<br />

in ways that are not contemplated by existing law. This is resulting in litigation <strong>and</strong><br />

increased scrutiny by state regulatory agencies. Physicians <strong>and</strong> other medical care<br />

practitioners are caught between the economic power of the managed care<br />

organizations with their control of the stream of patients, <strong>and</strong> the dem<strong>and</strong>s of patients<br />

<strong>and</strong> consumer advocates that they live up to the traditional values of the physician–<br />

patient relationship. There are several specific problem areas that will be discussed in<br />

this section. In general, medical care practitioners must assume that the traditional<br />

physician–patient relationship applies in the managed care setting until the courts or<br />

legislatures change the law.<br />

B. Establishing the Relationship<br />

Historically, the primary legal characteristic of the physician–patient relationship was<br />

that it was voluntary. The physician was free to choose which patients to treat. The<br />

patient, in theory, was free to choose a physician. Unfortunately, this voluntariness<br />

permitted racial, religious, <strong>and</strong> economic discrimination against patients. Federal <strong>and</strong><br />

217

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!