03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

funds, <strong>and</strong> less recourse for a physician caught in a conflict. A physician dealing with<br />

one of these funds, or any other insurer that may be captive of an adverse party,<br />

should hire his or her own counsel to monitor the defense attorney’s work.<br />

4. Antitrust Issues in Managed Care<br />

MCO costs for physician services decrease as MCOs gain market power; that is, as<br />

the MCOs attain economies of scale. Once MCOs become established in a market,<br />

they become an almost irresistible force. In most markets, patient lives are divided<br />

between several managed care organizations. However, MCOs seldom compete in<br />

terms of the contracts they offer physicians. They may compete on the price they will<br />

pay for buying practices, but they hold the line on the contractual rights of the<br />

physicians delivering medical care services.<br />

The cost of a practice is a one-time expenditure, but the costs <strong>and</strong> terms of physician<br />

contracts are long-term expenses that are key to the survival of MCOs. In many<br />

communities, physician contracts used by competing MCOs have identical terms.<br />

Although this might be parallel action based on similar needs, there also may be<br />

substantial collusion to ensure that no plan undermines the others by granting<br />

physicians substantially greater rights. In other businesses this would be an antitrust<br />

violation. MCOs are legally considered insurance companies, however, <strong>and</strong> they<br />

have McCarron-Ferguson immunity from federal antitrust laws. [15 U.S.C. § 1011<br />

(1996).] They cannot be sued for most antitrust activities.<br />

Unfortunately, physicians do not have the same immunity. Independent physician<br />

groups <strong>and</strong> local medical societies must be alert to potential antitrust violations.<br />

Independent contractor physicians who b<strong>and</strong> together to resist cram- down contracts<br />

from MCOs can be held to have engaged in a group boycott or other violations of the<br />

Sherman Antitrust Act. Such groups have been prosecuted by the FTC. This limits<br />

collective action by physicians to those that are employees of an MCO. Physicians<br />

who are MCO employees can unionize by following National Labor Relations Board<br />

(NLRB) st<strong>and</strong>ards. Once in an NLRB- certified union, they can strike or take other<br />

actions. Independent contractor physicians cannot unionize to gain the protection of<br />

the NLRB. For independent contractor physicians, the only avenue for collective<br />

action is to petition their state legislatures <strong>and</strong> Congress for statutory protections.<br />

Such collective action to petition the government for redress is protected under the<br />

Noerr- Pennington doctrine as a form of political speech. [Eastern R.R. Presidents<br />

Conf. v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc., 365 U.S. 127 (1961); United Mine Workers v.<br />

Pennington, 381 U.S. 657 (1965).]<br />

A major problem for physicians who are trying to b<strong>and</strong> together to bargain more<br />

effectively with MCOs has been the lack of both common law <strong>and</strong> regulatory<br />

guidance. In 1996, the Department of Justice <strong>and</strong> the Federal Trade Commission<br />

issued guidelines on medical care mergers <strong>and</strong> joint operating agreements. [United<br />

States Department of Justice & Federal Trade Commission, Statements of Antitrust<br />

Enforcement Policy in <strong>Health</strong> Care sec. B1, Statement 8 (August 1996).] Although<br />

some commentators have seen these as greatly exp<strong>and</strong>ing physician’s right to take<br />

427

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!