03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Fish R, Rosen P. Physicians should be expert witnesses. J Emerg Med.<br />

1990;8:659–663.<br />

Higgins LC. MD (medical director) witnesses: who are these experts? Med World<br />

News. 1988;29:28–36.<br />

Lundberg GD. Expert witness for whom? JAMA. 1984;252:251.<br />

Miller D. Courtroom science <strong>and</strong> st<strong>and</strong>ards of proof. Lancet. 1987;2:1283–1284.<br />

Robertson WO. Expert Witness Controversies in <strong>Medical</strong> Malpractice: A<br />

Preventive Approach. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press; 1985:124–<br />

136.<br />

Robertson WO. Some ‘experts’ may not be all that expert. WSMA Rep. June 1988:4.<br />

Statement on Qualifications <strong>and</strong> Guidelines for the Physician Expert Witness.<br />

Council of <strong>Medical</strong> Specialty Societies; 1989.<br />

Acknowledgment: The Committee on <strong>Medical</strong> Liability gratefully acknowledges<br />

the contributions of the American College of Obstetricians <strong>and</strong> Gynecologists<br />

(Ethical Issues Related to Expert Testimony by Obstetricians <strong>and</strong> Gynecologists)<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Council of <strong>Medical</strong> Specialty Societies (Statement on Qualifications <strong>and</strong><br />

Guidelines for the Physician Expert Witness) in the development of this policy<br />

statement.<br />

Note: The recommendations in this statement do not indicate an exclusive course<br />

of treatment or serve as a st<strong>and</strong>ard of medical care. Variations, taking into account<br />

individual circumstances, may be appropriate. PEDIATRICS (ISSN 0031 4005).<br />

Copyright © 1994 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.<br />

Source: Reprinted with permission from Guidelines for Expert Witness Testimony<br />

in <strong>Medical</strong> Liability Cases, Pediatrics, Vol. 94, No. 5, pp. 755–756, © 1994,<br />

American Academy of Pediatrics.<br />

E. Posttrial<br />

At the conclusion of the trial, the judge or jury will render a judgment: a decision on<br />

whether the defendant owes the plaintiff money. In a take nothing judgment, the<br />

defendant owes the plaintiff no money. For a certain period, the judgment may be<br />

appealed. If it is not appealed or if the court rejects the appeal, the judgment becomes<br />

payable. In some situations, the judgment is apportioned into periodic payments, but in<br />

most cases the full value of the judgment is due in cash.<br />

The judgment entered in a case is final unless an affected party can convince the<br />

appeals court that it should be reversed or modified because of legal errors. A common<br />

request is that a large judgment be reduced (remitted) as being unsupported by the<br />

facts. In most states, the judge who tried the case has the right to order that the plaintiff<br />

take less money than the jury has awarded. If the plaintiff refuses, the judge can order<br />

that the case be retried. When a case is accepted for review by a higher court, the<br />

168

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!