03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

protocols become generic documentation for those conditions. As long as the<br />

physician can convince a court that the protocols are enforced, the protocol becomes<br />

evidence of a pattern of behavior. In this case, the burden of proof is shifted to the<br />

plaintiff, who seeks to dispute that the protocol was followed. If the office does not<br />

rigorously enforce the use of protocols, each patient encounter must be fully<br />

documented. In effect, the core of what would be the protocol must be written as a<br />

chart entry every time the condition is treated. Failing in this repetitive<br />

documentation shifts the burden of proving what care was rendered to the physician.<br />

6. Physician Protocols<br />

Many group practice organizations use physician protocols to st<strong>and</strong>ardize medical<br />

practice within the group. The goal may be to improve consistency of care when a<br />

patient is likely to be seen by different doctors, to limit the number of drugs in the<br />

formulary, or to ensure that the physicians are following recognized st<strong>and</strong>ards, such<br />

as Centers for Disease Control (CDC) protocols, in their practices. Physician<br />

protocols do not place legal limitations on the physicians; they are characterized by<br />

their allowance for independent medical judgment. They are a voluntary or<br />

contractual agreement by the physicians to follow certain patterns when practicing<br />

within the group.<br />

A common example is a protocol for treating an MCO patient for essential<br />

hypertension. Typically this protocol would not include a definition of essential<br />

hypertension; every treating physician would be expected to be able to make the<br />

diagnosis. The protocol would contain a list of the diagnostic procedures to be done<br />

on a new patient. These might be arrived at by consensus after an analysis of the<br />

costs <strong>and</strong> benefits of each test. Every patient might have a blood count but only those<br />

over age 40 years would have an electrocardiogram. The protocol would then list the<br />

drugs to be prescribed for certain types of patients. A beta- blocker might be first<br />

choice, with an alpha- blocker substituted if the patient does not respond well or is<br />

over 60 years old. The drugs on the list also would be in the formulary.<br />

The physician protocol guides rather than dictates patient care. If a physician wants<br />

to use a different drug from the established st<strong>and</strong>ard, the reasons for deviation should<br />

be documented, but the physician is legally free to make the change (subject,<br />

however, to discipline by the MCO). In contrast, an NPP would not be allowed to use<br />

such a protocol becasue it leaves the diagnosis open <strong>and</strong> allows choice in the use of<br />

medicines, both of which require exercising medical judgment.<br />

7. Teaching Protocols<br />

Teaching protocols, also called teaching algorithms, fall somewhere between strict<br />

protocols <strong>and</strong> physician protocols; they guide students through the exercise of<br />

professional judgment. Teaching protocols thus fill the dual purpose of providing<br />

consistency of care <strong>and</strong> helping students learn how to make good judgments.<br />

The hallmark of a teaching protocol is a differential diagnosis list, which is<br />

406

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!