03.08.2013 Views

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

Public Health Law Map - Beta 5 - Medical and Public Health Law Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

c) Informal Consultations<br />

One of the banes of physicians is the curbside consult. These are best h<strong>and</strong>led in the<br />

same way as a telephone call. A nonpatient who needs care should be referred in a<br />

manner appropriate to the urgency of the presenting condition. If the physician<br />

consults with a patient, appropriate records should be kept. With one caveat,<br />

informal consultations should be documented in the same manner as telephone<br />

calls. When a person telephones a physician, that person has demonstrated a much<br />

greater level of concern than someone who just makes conversation with a<br />

physician at a party. All telephone calls should be documented, but it is not<br />

necessary to record every social conversation that turns to a person’s medical<br />

condition. The physician should record substantive discussions with existing<br />

patients in the patient’s medical record <strong>and</strong> any consultations in which he or she<br />

recommended treatment or referred the patient for evaluation of an emergent<br />

condition.<br />

3. Financial Considerations<br />

The most common reason for refusing to accept a patient is the patient’s potential<br />

inability to pay for the necessary medical services. Patients should be given some<br />

indication of the financial requirements when they make an appointment for<br />

treatment to prevent them from delaying making other arrangements for care while<br />

waiting for an appointment at which they will receive no treatment. A defensible<br />

decision not to accept a patient for financial reasons can appear questionable in<br />

retrospect if the person was injured by the subsequent delay in receiving medical<br />

care.<br />

Some physicians will not treat certain individuals or classes of patients. Perhaps the<br />

most common restriction is refusing to treat patients involved in accidents that will<br />

lead to litigation. Some physicians refuse to treat attorneys. Many obstetricians<br />

refuse to treat a pregnant woman who first seeks care after the sixth month of<br />

pregnancy. These decisions are shortsighted in a competitive market <strong>and</strong> ethically<br />

questionable in a market where they may make it difficult for the affected persons to<br />

obtain care; but they are not illegal.<br />

4. Assisting at Accidents<br />

A physician has no duty to help an injured or sick individual unless there is a<br />

preexisting physician–patient relationship or other statutory or contractual<br />

relationship. Although morally reprehensible, it is not illegal for a physician to drive<br />

past the scene of an accident where his or her services could be lifesaving or to<br />

refuse to provide cardiopulmonary resuscitation to a fellow diner at a restaurant. If<br />

the physician does choose to help, there is one central rule for volunteers: do not<br />

make the victim worse off.<br />

The classic legal example is the person drowning in a lake. There are several boats<br />

222

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!