CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: <strong>CRR</strong><br />
1.1.49<br />
1.1.50<br />
1.1.51<br />
1.1.52<br />
Stephen Knobel<br />
(137)<br />
D.G. & J.L. Falck<br />
(64)<br />
D.G. & J.L. Falck<br />
(64)<br />
D.G. & J.L. Falck<br />
(64)<br />
Referring to Page 126, there's a gap in your<br />
historical background with regards to when<br />
the Coloured fishermen who resided in<br />
harbour are were removed to make a way<br />
for the white, current day settlement.<br />
Please investigate if there are no links<br />
between this event and the peculiar title<br />
deed restriction.<br />
The design of the building is fairly formal,<br />
and will inhibit the holiday feeling the<br />
harbour and Erf 848 currently has. This is<br />
further enhanced by the fact that a wall is<br />
planned between the harbour and Erf 848 –<br />
a sure way of creating a psychological and<br />
physical boundary between the property<br />
and harbour and their respective uses<br />
The proposed building is not in line with<br />
existing buildings in the area, nor is it‟s<br />
proposed usage. It can therefore not be<br />
approved.<br />
Up to now, all buildings in Struisbaai have<br />
been fewer storeys than what is planned.<br />
The fact that a two storey development is<br />
not feasible should not be a reason to<br />
extend zoning parameters to more levels,<br />
this is a town-planning issue not an<br />
economic concern. Should the economic<br />
concern outweigh the town-planning<br />
concerns, I can probably request to have<br />
more buildings on my residential plot, so<br />
that my tenants can share in my bond<br />
repayment costs - clearly this is not a<br />
legitimate argument for a four storey<br />
development being approved!<br />
Please refer to Section 2.8.1 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />
Your comment is noted. The proposed design<br />
does not have a boundary wall planned on the<br />
north and west side of the development.<br />
Your statement is noted. Please refer to<br />
Section 2.7 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />
Noted. The proponent has been required to<br />
motivate the height of their design and this is<br />
included in Annexure O & Annexure P of the<br />
<strong>FEIR</strong>. Please refer to Sections 1.4, 2.6 and<br />
2.7 of the <strong>FEIR</strong> for a discussion of this matter.<br />
The SDF has a two storey height restriction<br />
for the area and thus Cape Agulhas<br />
Municipality and the competent authority<br />
would be required to make a decision whether<br />
or not this development could be exempted<br />
from this restriction and to what extent.<br />
Planning<br />
Planning<br />
Planning<br />
Planning<br />
I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\<strong>CRR</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>FEIR</strong> ~ <strong>26042010</strong> [<strong>FINAL</strong>].doc 14 of 193