28.12.2013 Views

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: <strong>CRR</strong><br />

1.1.49<br />

1.1.50<br />

1.1.51<br />

1.1.52<br />

Stephen Knobel<br />

(137)<br />

D.G. & J.L. Falck<br />

(64)<br />

D.G. & J.L. Falck<br />

(64)<br />

D.G. & J.L. Falck<br />

(64)<br />

Referring to Page 126, there's a gap in your<br />

historical background with regards to when<br />

the Coloured fishermen who resided in<br />

harbour are were removed to make a way<br />

for the white, current day settlement.<br />

Please investigate if there are no links<br />

between this event and the peculiar title<br />

deed restriction.<br />

The design of the building is fairly formal,<br />

and will inhibit the holiday feeling the<br />

harbour and Erf 848 currently has. This is<br />

further enhanced by the fact that a wall is<br />

planned between the harbour and Erf 848 –<br />

a sure way of creating a psychological and<br />

physical boundary between the property<br />

and harbour and their respective uses<br />

The proposed building is not in line with<br />

existing buildings in the area, nor is it‟s<br />

proposed usage. It can therefore not be<br />

approved.<br />

Up to now, all buildings in Struisbaai have<br />

been fewer storeys than what is planned.<br />

The fact that a two storey development is<br />

not feasible should not be a reason to<br />

extend zoning parameters to more levels,<br />

this is a town-planning issue not an<br />

economic concern. Should the economic<br />

concern outweigh the town-planning<br />

concerns, I can probably request to have<br />

more buildings on my residential plot, so<br />

that my tenants can share in my bond<br />

repayment costs - clearly this is not a<br />

legitimate argument for a four storey<br />

development being approved!<br />

Please refer to Section 2.8.1 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Your comment is noted. The proposed design<br />

does not have a boundary wall planned on the<br />

north and west side of the development.<br />

Your statement is noted. Please refer to<br />

Section 2.7 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Noted. The proponent has been required to<br />

motivate the height of their design and this is<br />

included in Annexure O & Annexure P of the<br />

<strong>FEIR</strong>. Please refer to Sections 1.4, 2.6 and<br />

2.7 of the <strong>FEIR</strong> for a discussion of this matter.<br />

The SDF has a two storey height restriction<br />

for the area and thus Cape Agulhas<br />

Municipality and the competent authority<br />

would be required to make a decision whether<br />

or not this development could be exempted<br />

from this restriction and to what extent.<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\<strong>CRR</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>FEIR</strong> ~ <strong>26042010</strong> [<strong>FINAL</strong>].doc 14 of 193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!