28.12.2013 Views

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: <strong>CRR</strong><br />

1.1.49<br />

1.1.50<br />

1.1.51<br />

1.1.52<br />

Stephen Knobel<br />

(137)<br />

D.G. & J.L. Falck<br />

(64)<br />

D.G. & J.L. Falck<br />

(64)<br />

D.G. & J.L. Falck<br />

(64)<br />

Referring to Page 126, there's a gap in your<br />

historical background with regards to when<br />

the Coloured fishermen who resided in<br />

harbour are were removed to make a way<br />

for the white, current day settlement.<br />

Please investigate if there are no links<br />

between this event and the peculiar title<br />

deed restriction.<br />

The design of the building is fairly formal,<br />

and will inhibit the holiday feeling the<br />

harbour and Erf 848 currently has. This is<br />

further enhanced by the fact that a wall is<br />

planned between the harbour and Erf 848 –<br />

a sure way of creating a psychological and<br />

physical boundary between the property<br />

and harbour and their respective uses<br />

The proposed building is not in line with<br />

existing buildings in the area, nor is it‟s<br />

proposed usage. It can therefore not be<br />

approved.<br />

Up to now, all buildings in Struisbaai have<br />

been fewer storeys than what is planned.<br />

The fact that a two storey development is<br />

not feasible should not be a reason to<br />

extend zoning parameters to more levels,<br />

this is a town-planning issue not an<br />

economic concern. Should the economic<br />

concern outweigh the town-planning<br />

concerns, I can probably request to have<br />

more buildings on my residential plot, so<br />

that my tenants can share in my bond<br />

repayment costs - clearly this is not a<br />

legitimate argument for a four storey<br />

development being approved!<br />

Please refer to Section 2.8.1 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Your comment is noted. The proposed design<br />

does not have a boundary wall planned on the<br />

north and west side of the development.<br />

Your statement is noted. Please refer to<br />

Section 2.7 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Noted. The proponent has been required to<br />

motivate the height of their design and this is<br />

included in Annexure O & Annexure P of the<br />

<strong>FEIR</strong>. Please refer to Sections 1.4, 2.6 and<br />

2.7 of the <strong>FEIR</strong> for a discussion of this matter.<br />

The SDF has a two storey height restriction<br />

for the area and thus Cape Agulhas<br />

Municipality and the competent authority<br />

would be required to make a decision whether<br />

or not this development could be exempted<br />

from this restriction and to what extent.<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\<strong>CRR</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>FEIR</strong> ~ <strong>26042010</strong> [<strong>FINAL</strong>].doc 14 of 193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!