28.12.2013 Views

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: <strong>CRR</strong><br />

1.7.160<br />

1.7.161<br />

1.7.162<br />

1.7.163<br />

Hans Swart (27)<br />

Wentzel van Renen<br />

(134)<br />

Andre van der Berg<br />

(145)<br />

Justine Sweet (97)<br />

Quality of life: Questionable aesthetic value<br />

of the proposed buildings and view of the<br />

landscape (not the same as visual impact).<br />

The proposed buildings would take away<br />

my view.<br />

Houses close to the development will loose<br />

their view.<br />

The proposed building will have negative<br />

visual impact.<br />

Importantly, the development proponent<br />

refused to consider a two storey alternative<br />

as it is allegedly not financially sustainable<br />

[p. 48 of dEIR]. The development<br />

proponent therefore proposes a mix of two<br />

to four storey buildings notwithstanding the<br />

SDF two storey limit for buildings within the<br />

secondary business node. In fact, the<br />

development proponent seeks to justify this<br />

proposed contravention by pointing out<br />

other contraventions within Struisbaai. This<br />

proposal also ignores the Western Cape's<br />

DEADP. suggestion in this regard as well<br />

as the interested and affected parties'<br />

comments receiving during the Scoping<br />

Phase which revealed that there would be<br />

less public resistance to a two storey<br />

development [p.48 of dEIR].<br />

Please refer to Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6 of the<br />

<strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Please refer to Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6 of the<br />

<strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Please refer to Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6 of the<br />

<strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

This point was raised at the public meeting<br />

that took place on the 31 October 2009 and<br />

as a consequence an independent review of<br />

the Feasibility Statement compiled by the<br />

proponent was undertaken. Turner &<br />

Townsend were appointed to assess the<br />

financial viability and this can be read in detail<br />

in Section 2.4.6 and Annexure P of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Visual impact<br />

Visual impact<br />

Visual impact<br />

Visual impact<br />

I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\<strong>CRR</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>FEIR</strong> ~ <strong>26042010</strong> [<strong>FINAL</strong>].doc 93 of 193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!