CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: <strong>CRR</strong><br />
1.7.160<br />
1.7.161<br />
1.7.162<br />
1.7.163<br />
Hans Swart (27)<br />
Wentzel van Renen<br />
(134)<br />
Andre van der Berg<br />
(145)<br />
Justine Sweet (97)<br />
Quality of life: Questionable aesthetic value<br />
of the proposed buildings and view of the<br />
landscape (not the same as visual impact).<br />
The proposed buildings would take away<br />
my view.<br />
Houses close to the development will loose<br />
their view.<br />
The proposed building will have negative<br />
visual impact.<br />
Importantly, the development proponent<br />
refused to consider a two storey alternative<br />
as it is allegedly not financially sustainable<br />
[p. 48 of dEIR]. The development<br />
proponent therefore proposes a mix of two<br />
to four storey buildings notwithstanding the<br />
SDF two storey limit for buildings within the<br />
secondary business node. In fact, the<br />
development proponent seeks to justify this<br />
proposed contravention by pointing out<br />
other contraventions within Struisbaai. This<br />
proposal also ignores the Western Cape's<br />
DEADP. suggestion in this regard as well<br />
as the interested and affected parties'<br />
comments receiving during the Scoping<br />
Phase which revealed that there would be<br />
less public resistance to a two storey<br />
development [p.48 of dEIR].<br />
Please refer to Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6 of the<br />
<strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />
Please refer to Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6 of the<br />
<strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />
Please refer to Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6 of the<br />
<strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />
This point was raised at the public meeting<br />
that took place on the 31 October 2009 and<br />
as a consequence an independent review of<br />
the Feasibility Statement compiled by the<br />
proponent was undertaken. Turner &<br />
Townsend were appointed to assess the<br />
financial viability and this can be read in detail<br />
in Section 2.4.6 and Annexure P of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />
Visual impact<br />
Visual impact<br />
Visual impact<br />
Visual impact<br />
I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\<strong>CRR</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>FEIR</strong> ~ <strong>26042010</strong> [<strong>FINAL</strong>].doc 93 of 193