CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: CRR 1.7.112 1.7.113 1.7.114 1.7.115 Johan Liebenberg, Dorel Van der Westhuizen, Kobus Viljoen, Abrie Bruwer, Chris Moll, Stuart Du Plessis, G. R. Youldon, Johan Venter (59, 73, 69, 66, 65, 172, 93, 78) Johan Liebenberg, Dorel Van der Westhuizen, Kobus Viljoen, Abrie Bruwer, Chris Moll, Stuart Du Plessis, G. R. Youldon, Johan Venter (59, 73, 69, 66, 65, 172, 93, 78) Johan Liebenberg, Dorel Van der Westhuizen, Kobus Viljoen, Abrie Bruwer, Chris Moll, Stuart Du Plessis, G. R. Youldon, Johan Venter (59, 73, 69, 66, 65, 172, 93, 78) Johan Liebenberg, Dorel Van der Westhuizen, Kobus Viljoen, Abrie Bruwer, Chris Moll, Stuart Du Plessis, G. R. Youldon, Johan Venter (59, 73, 69, 66, 65, 172, 93, 78) Kusweg Oos is a tranquil street, where people walk their dogs and children play. It is therefore unacceptable for the development (illegal) to be undertaken on this tranquil area. Struisbaai harbour is a quaint untouched fishing harbour with a fish processing facility that caters for traditional fisherfolk and that cannot be taken away. The proposed development does not fit with the character of Struisbaai harbour area. The development of heritage activities is rated low, the traditional fisherman is endangered as it is, and your development will be the last straw. Please refer to Section 5.2.2 of the FEIR for the traffic assessment. Noted. Aspects of the existing activities are incorporated into the proposed design. The idea is not to disadvantage the fisherfolk, but rather to maximize the opportunities for them, in the context of the proposed development. Your concern is noted. Please refer to Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6 of the FEIR. Your concern is noted. Please refer to Sections 1.6.15 and 1.13.26 of this Comment and Response Report. Sense of place Sense of place Sense of place Sense of Place I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].doc 86 of 193
EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: CRR 1.7.116 81, 79, 95, 85, 84, 90, 160, 162, 164, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 153, 150, 151, 116, 102, 103, 101, 99, 100, 98, 92, 94, 163, 174, 175, 176, 177, 178, 33, 179, 180, 181, 182 This harbour is one of the few remaining unspoilt commercial harbours on our coastline, it should not be changed. Your concern is noted. Please refer to Section 5.2.4 and 5.2.6 of the FEIR. Sense of place 1.7.117 1.7.118 1.7.119 A.F. & J.H. Tooke (67) Johan Van Zyl (15) Johan Van Zyl (15) Since when does a four storey building in any way resemble a fisherman's cottage? as stated on proposed design. The statement that these fisherman's cottages once existed is also incorrect, as they still exist in the vicinity and are a trademark of the Struisbaai area. Their attractiveness is directly linked to their simplicity, unobtrusiveness and the manner in which they blend into the environment with their single storeys, white washed walls and thatched roofs. They do not have negative visual impacts as the proposed development. Planning of the proposed building is poor and will have a negative effect on aesthetics. It would stick out like a sore thumb in an area that has been developed for many years as a unit. Even a two storey building will impact negatively on aesthetics – in our opinion this is very clear from the photos and plans provided. The proposed building would impact negatively on the view of existing properties. It might be wise to consult judicature regarding this issue as the Supreme High Court has shown to be sensitive about the rights of established residents, including rights associated with aesthetics. Please refer to Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6 of the FEIR. Stauch Vorster: Some elements of the proposed building are based on the esthetics of the fishermans cottage, not the physical form. For instance the white washed walls and the chimneys and the pitched roofs with gable walls Please refer to Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6 of the FEIR. Please refer to Sections 5.2.5 and 5.2.6 of the FEIR. Design/ Visual Visual impact Visual impact I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].doc 87 of 193
Page 1 and 2:
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT (EI
Page 3 and 4:
EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUA
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36: EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUA
Page 49 and 50: 1.3.47 1.3.48 1.3.49 1.3.50 1.3.51
Page 85: EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUA
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193:
show all

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?