28.12.2013 Views

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: <strong>CRR</strong><br />

1.2.67<br />

1.2.68<br />

Johan Liebenberg,<br />

Dorel Van der<br />

Westhuizen, Kobus<br />

Viljoen, Abrie<br />

Bruwer, Chris Moll,<br />

Stuart Du Plessis,<br />

G. R. Youldon,<br />

Johan Venter (59,<br />

73, 69, 66, 65, 172,<br />

93, 78)<br />

Johan Liebenberg,<br />

Dorel Van der<br />

Westhuizen, Kobus<br />

Viljoen, Abrie<br />

Bruwer, Chris Moll,<br />

Stuart Du Plessis,<br />

G. R. Youldon,<br />

Johan Venter (59,<br />

73, 69, 66, 65, 172,<br />

93, 78)<br />

I further object to the assessment of<br />

sewage as being medium, there is no<br />

system in place to handle the sewerage<br />

from the development. A line of +- 6km has<br />

to be installed at the significant cost to the<br />

tax payer, this will have a very high impact.<br />

Water supply is already rationed in high<br />

season without this development, and this<br />

should be rated as high impact, as do<br />

fishing and associated activities “(repair<br />

jetty closed)”. Bait and ice has to become<br />

MCM responsibility.<br />

Please refer to Section 5.2.1 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Please refer to Chapter 4 of the <strong>FEIR</strong> to<br />

determine how the ratings were achieved.<br />

Municipal<br />

Services<br />

Municipal<br />

Services<br />

1.3 Impact on traffic flow<br />

and parking<br />

1.3.1<br />

1.3.2<br />

1.3.3<br />

Petrus Jurgens<br />

Visser (4)<br />

Johan Van Zyl (15)<br />

Anton Louw (17)<br />

There won't be enough parking.<br />

The proposed development would attract<br />

more people, more businesses and a<br />

congested traffic, and therefore is not<br />

required.<br />

The parking allowed for on the adjacent erf<br />

will be insufficient or the design should<br />

allow parking of all the fishing trailers over<br />

the peak periods.<br />

Disagree, please refer to Section 5.2.2 of the<br />

<strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Development would attract more people and<br />

assist in providing a practical traffic solution to<br />

accommodate the current congestion as well<br />

as any future congestion caused by<br />

development in the harbour precinct. Please<br />

refer to Section 5.2.2 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Please refer to Section 5.2.2 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Public parking is the CAM‟s responsibility and<br />

traffic alternative 4, as a product of this EIA,<br />

was deemed by the traffic specialists to the<br />

most appropriate traffic solution for the<br />

area.Parking bays have been purposely<br />

angeled to accommodate boats with trailers.<br />

Traffic flow &<br />

Parking<br />

Traffic flow &<br />

Parking<br />

Traffic flow &<br />

Parking<br />

I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\<strong>CRR</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>FEIR</strong> ~ <strong>26042010</strong> [<strong>FINAL</strong>].doc 39 of 193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!