CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: <strong>CRR</strong><br />
Please refer to Annexure U of the <strong>FEIR</strong><br />
regarding tourism potential.<br />
7.1.34<br />
7.1.35<br />
7.1.36<br />
7.1.37<br />
7.1.38<br />
David McKinstry<br />
(21)<br />
David McKinstry<br />
(21)<br />
David McKinstry<br />
(21)<br />
Evan Meirion<br />
Williams (31)<br />
Neville Van der<br />
Westhuizen (71)<br />
The economic assessment is riddled with<br />
generalities and frankly who knows what the<br />
long term effect will be. No attempt seems<br />
to have been made to get tourism experts to<br />
concur with the consultant‟s views.<br />
No amount of bleating about needing 4<br />
stories to make the development viable<br />
justifies the developer's application.<br />
There is no need i.e. legal, environmental,<br />
or social to rescue the developer from his<br />
mistaken assumption, at the expense of the<br />
fishing, residential or visiting community of<br />
Struisbaai<br />
There have been enough proposed<br />
developments in sensitive areas in the<br />
recent past. Most of these have been<br />
characterised by the cultivating of<br />
inappropriate political involvement to “ease”<br />
the approval of the project.<br />
Referring to Page two of the Executive<br />
Summary it is unreasonable to state that the<br />
buildings are approximately 9m above<br />
mean sea level (amsl), which equates to<br />
+5m above natural ground level (ngl).<br />
Unless the intention is to raise the ground<br />
floor of the development by more than one<br />
floor height above natural ground level,<br />
therefore no need to excavate for the<br />
proposed basement.<br />
Economic Specialist comment:<br />
Indeed, assessing long term economic effects<br />
with high levels of confidence is difficult which<br />
is why bold statements, potentially misleading<br />
quantification or „long-shot‟ predictions have<br />
been avoided. This helps to avoid spurious<br />
„accuracy‟, but probably increases the<br />
potential for comments that the report is too<br />
„general‟.<br />
Noted. Please refer to Section 2.4.6 and<br />
Annexure R of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />
Noted. The proponent has the right to develop<br />
Erf 848 (private property) within the confines<br />
of the CAMSDF (2009) as well as statutory<br />
requirements.<br />
Noted. The proponent has the right to<br />
develop Erf 848 (private property) within the<br />
confines of the CAMSDF (2009) as well as<br />
statutory requirements.<br />
These heights are referring to the current<br />
buildings i.e. Alternative 5 and not Alternative<br />
6 (proposed development).<br />
Statement<br />
Statement<br />
Statement<br />
Statement<br />
Statement<br />
I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\<strong>CRR</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>FEIR</strong> ~ <strong>26042010</strong> [<strong>FINAL</strong>].doc 183 of 193