28.12.2013 Views

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: <strong>CRR</strong><br />

1.1.14<br />

1.1.15<br />

1.1.16<br />

1.1.17<br />

1.1.18<br />

1.1.19<br />

David McKinstry<br />

(21)<br />

David McKinstry<br />

(21)<br />

David McKinstry<br />

(21)<br />

Evan Meirion<br />

Williams (31)<br />

Dirk de Jongh on<br />

behalf of Struisbaai<br />

Home Owners<br />

Assosciation (72)<br />

Dirk de Jongh on<br />

behalf of Struisbaai<br />

Home Owners<br />

Assosciation (72)<br />

There is an existing right of way for the<br />

public. The fact that additional land has<br />

been reclaimed from the sea in front of erf<br />

848 does not entitle the developer or<br />

anyone else to appropriate the existing right<br />

of way for their own purposes. They have<br />

no more right to that ground than I have!<br />

Erf 848 in Struisbaai was not planned to be<br />

a residential property rather as a fish<br />

handling facility with later modifications to<br />

allow for the Pelican restaurant operation.<br />

It would be reasonable for the proponent to<br />

re-develop the current site within the current<br />

regulations and planning guidelines<br />

including height and coverage restrictions to<br />

accommodate other food and small shop<br />

facilities<br />

A high rise building for whatever purpose on<br />

the most prominent and most visited<br />

position on the unspoiled seafront of<br />

Struisbaai is ridiculous.<br />

The proposed development would violate<br />

many legal issues and I am sure the Cliffe<br />

Decker submission will cover this.<br />

Referring to the Need and desirability”. The<br />

statement that “strategic documents such<br />

as the Spatial Development<br />

Framework……….support the development”<br />

is not true. The current SDF (2005), as well<br />

as the 1992 Structure Plan for Struisbaai,<br />

does not provide for this type of high density<br />

development.<br />

The SDF is currently being revised. None of<br />

the suggestions made by consultants in the<br />

review document makes provision for the<br />

type of development planned for erf 848. In<br />

fact, the document notes that coastal<br />

developments must adhere to national<br />

requirements, including that developments<br />

must take place based on the capacity of<br />

municipal infrastructure<br />

Please refer to Section 1.1.13 of this<br />

Comment and Response Report.<br />

As there were amendments to cater for<br />

Pelicans so to would further amendments be<br />

required to the title deeds. Please refer to<br />

Sections 1.4, 2.6 and 2.7 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Your concern is noted. Please refer to Section<br />

2.7 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

The final development would need to comply<br />

with all legislation. Please refer to Sections<br />

1.3, 1.6, 2.6 and 2.7 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Please refer to Sections 1.4 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>. A<br />

new SDF has been passed in accordance<br />

with the Municipal Systems Act as of<br />

December 2009. The 2009 CAM SDF<br />

promotes development within the urban edge,<br />

of which Erf 848 is located.<br />

Please refer to Section 1.3.5, 1.3.8, 1.4, 2.6,<br />

2.7 and 7.5 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\<strong>CRR</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>FEIR</strong> ~ <strong>26042010</strong> [<strong>FINAL</strong>].doc 9 of 193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!