28.12.2013 Views

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: <strong>CRR</strong><br />

1.1.60<br />

1.1.61<br />

1.1.62<br />

1.1.63<br />

1.1.64<br />

Jack Smith (60)<br />

Jack Smith (60)<br />

Jack Smith (60)<br />

Jack Smith (60)<br />

Jack Smith (60)<br />

The property size is indicated as 3 805 m 2<br />

(page 3 of the Executive Summary) and on<br />

page 4 the soil surface area of the<br />

development is indicated as 3 659 m 2 .<br />

Thus, 96% of the property will be<br />

developed, which to my knowledge is<br />

against the building regulations. To my<br />

knowledge building areas are restricted to<br />

75%.<br />

What other building regulations will be<br />

infringed upon? There is no reference in<br />

your documents regarding these<br />

transgressions.<br />

The following comment on page 3 doesn‟t<br />

ring true: “As the site is limited in size (3 805<br />

m 2 ), maximum use is proposed for the site<br />

for the project to be financially optimized.<br />

Site layout alternatives are thus limited. Site<br />

layout alternatives have been considered in<br />

the design iterations. Only one feasible<br />

layout is therefore assessed.” This is an<br />

unacceptable excuse. Restrictions should<br />

have been investigated beforehand. The<br />

developer should not try to play on people's<br />

feelings and argue there are limited<br />

alternatives.<br />

Did the developer receive approval<br />

beforehand from the municipality to exceed<br />

the building regulations?<br />

General opinion: “Design buildings to<br />

optimize on natural energy, i.e. North facing<br />

and windows shaded in summer”. What<br />

about winter months?<br />

A new SDF has been passed in accordance<br />

with the Municipal Systems Act as of<br />

December 2009. The 2009 CAM SDF<br />

promotes development within the urban edge,<br />

of which Erf 848 is located. Please refer to<br />

Section 1.4 and 2.7 of the <strong>FEIR</strong><br />

Please refer to Sections 2.6 and 2.7 of the<br />

<strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

The proponent bought the site with the view to<br />

develop it in such a way to ensure that it is<br />

economically sustainable. The competent<br />

authority would need to make a final decision<br />

on whether the proposal is acceptable.<br />

The developer was advised that due process<br />

needed to be followed as standard practive.<br />

Please refer to Sections 2.6 and 2.7 of the<br />

<strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />

North facing is particularly important for winter<br />

months.<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

Planning<br />

I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\<strong>CRR</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>FEIR</strong> ~ <strong>26042010</strong> [<strong>FINAL</strong>].doc 16 of 193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!