CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects

EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: CRR
1.1.6
1.1.7
1.1.8
1.1.9
1.1.10
1.1.11
Julian G Williams
(47)
E. Ley Kempthorne
(49)
Frances Pienaar
(58)
Frances Pienaar
(58)
Frances Pienaar
(58)
David McKinstry
(21)
1.1.12 David McKinstry
(21)
1.1.13
David McKinstry
(21)
The proposed development will encroach
the 100m from high water mark building
restriction.
The EIA Report mentions six different
alternatives, four of which are rejected as
being not accepted by the broader public
and only two alternatives were considered
in detail. The preferred alternative is not in
line with the planning regulations in the
area, namely 70% coverage and a height of
only 2 stories, this option is clearly an
attempt on the developer's side to maximise
profits.
The site is not zoned for a residential or
hotel development.
Four storey buildings are not allowed under
the regulations in place.
The proposed building will cover more than
the regulated ground coverage allowances.
The proposed building is in contradiction
with the Spatial Development Plan for the
area which allows for a limit of two stories
and this should be enforced.
The Tommy Brummer report is essentially a
proposal to circumvent by application or
negotiation substantive issues of coverage
as well as height e.g. street access, loading
bays and of course, site coverage.
Apart from the fact that the proposed
building would cover the whole site, the
developer and his agents want to
appropriate public land. They want to build
on a servitude and access their
development over public parking.
This is one of the factors that triggered the
basic assessment listed activities of R386.
Refer to Section 1.3.1, Table 1.1.
Please refer to Sections 2.6 and 2.7 of the
FEIR.
Please refer to Sections 2.6 and 2.7 of the
FEIR.
Please refer to Sections 2.6 and 2.7 of the
FEIR.
Please refer to Sections 2.6 and 2.7 of the
FEIR.
A new SDF has been passed in accordance
with the Municipal Systems Act as of
December 2009. The 2009 CAM SDF
promotes development within the urban edge,
of which Erf 848 is located. Please refer to
Section 1.4 and 2.7 of the FEIR
The Tommy Brummer report provides detailed
information in terms of the proposed process
that would be applied for to secure the
requisite zonation & amendment of certain
title deed restrictions
Please refer to Sections 1.3.8, 2.6 and 2.7 of
the FEIR. Unless the servitude restriction
amendment is approved, the proponent is
required to respect the rights maintained in
the title deeds regarding the servitude. The
formalization of erf 921 for public parking and
access as well as an entry/exit point was
provisionally granted in accordance with the
CAM letter in Annexure A of the FEIR.
Planning
Planning
Planning
Planning
Planning
Planning
Planning
Planning
I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].doc 8 of 193