CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
CRR IV FEIR ~ 26042010 [FINAL].pdf - Environmental Projects
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
EIA FOR THE PROPOSED LANGEZANDT QUAYS DEVELOPMENT IN STRUISBAAI HARBOUR: <strong>CRR</strong><br />
3.1.106<br />
3.1.107<br />
3.1.108<br />
3.1.109<br />
Justine Sweet (97)<br />
Justine Sweet (97)<br />
Carel Schaap (165)<br />
Louis Pisani (96)<br />
It does not appear that particular steps have<br />
been taken to inform and address the<br />
concerns of the community of Struisbaai<br />
Noord (including the local fishermen) who<br />
will be particularly affected by a<br />
development which essentially caters for<br />
once-off tourists rather than the Struisbaai<br />
public;<br />
To date, not all homeowners have been<br />
informed of, are aware of or have<br />
commented on the proposed development<br />
[We confirm that for example, one Judge<br />
Combrink who resides in Natal but owns a<br />
house in close proximity to the proposed<br />
development only became aware of the<br />
proposed development when John van<br />
Niekerk advised him of it telephonically].<br />
As stated elsewhere in this report, the<br />
requirement for full public participation and<br />
consultation must be greater given the<br />
public nature of the site and the rights<br />
attaching to it.<br />
A much more inclusive process of public<br />
participation is required. I own property in<br />
Struisbaai, yet accidentally learned (very<br />
late) of this report. This development<br />
process excludes interested and affected<br />
parties and this needs to be addressed.<br />
If you consider the combined investment of<br />
all these individuals at present property<br />
prices and you compare it to the input cost<br />
of the developer I think the public<br />
participation process is flawed and biased in<br />
favour of the developer.<br />
Please refer to Chapter 3 of the <strong>FEIR</strong><br />
regarding the public participation process.<br />
The fisherfolk have furthermore been<br />
personally invited to participate through their<br />
representatives and have chosen to attend<br />
the meetings in small numbers. To this end,<br />
the social impact assessment undertaken<br />
addressed the fisherfolk to ensure issues<br />
raised were considered and included in the<br />
EIA. A detailed independent Social Impact<br />
Assessment was undertaken to ensure all<br />
spheres of the Struisbaai community were<br />
consulted (Annexure H of the <strong>FEIR</strong>). Please<br />
also refer to Section 5.2.3 of the <strong>FEIR</strong><br />
regarding opportunities for Struisbaai. Please<br />
refer to Section 1.13.26 of this Comment and<br />
Response Report regarding the fisher folk‟s<br />
concerns being considered.<br />
Please refer to Chapter 3 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>. The<br />
<strong>Environmental</strong> Assessment Practitioner has<br />
gone beyond what is legally required to<br />
accommodate I&APs and has taken all<br />
reasonable steps to ensure I&APs are<br />
informed as the EIA process continues.<br />
Please refer to Section 3 of the <strong>FEIR</strong><br />
regarding the extensive public participation<br />
process.<br />
All reasonable steps have been taken to<br />
include and promote public engagement<br />
through the EIA to date. Please refer to<br />
Section 3 of the <strong>FEIR</strong>.<br />
Process<br />
Process<br />
Process<br />
Process<br />
I:\ENV\PROJECTS\401807~Struisbaai\Public Participation\Comments & Response\EIR\<strong>CRR</strong> <strong>IV</strong> <strong>FEIR</strong> ~ <strong>26042010</strong> [<strong>FINAL</strong>].doc 146 of 193