30.10.2012 Views

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Adina Catana and Lavinia Delcea<br />

the local region; and 4) the achievement of a regional economic structure that is based upon local<br />

initiatives and locally created comparative advantages. The model underlined the roles of the<br />

entrepreneur and human capital in the process of economic growth, and the spatial effects of the<br />

expansion of the firm.<br />

Matei, Anghelescu and Săvulescu (2009) consider that local development refers to the capacity of<br />

local or regional economy to stimulate stable economic and social growth, intended to lead to the<br />

creation of new jobs and the conditions <strong>for</strong> making the most of opportunities arising from changes in<br />

economic, technical and social fields.<br />

Profiroiu, Racoviţeanu and Ţarălungă (1999) believe that local development can take two <strong>for</strong>ms,<br />

namely: development of enterprises, respectively strengthening the power of communities by<br />

increasing employment and income of its population and possibly reviving the economy. The authors<br />

consider that local development funding is the responsibility of local government, the use of private<br />

financing being per<strong>for</strong>med only when they have exhausted the usual ways of financing public<br />

expenditure (Profiroiu, Racoviţeanu and Ţarălungă, 1999, p.27).<br />

According to Matei and Anghelescu (2009), local development means boost and diversification of<br />

economic activities, stimulation of investment as well as contribution to reducing unemployment and<br />

improving living standards. Also in their opinion, local development is the result of combined ef<strong>for</strong>ts<br />

made by representatives from all sectors of government, civil society and business environment in<br />

order to create favorable conditions <strong>for</strong> economic growth and new jobs. The authors consider that the<br />

meaning given to local development lately is the one linking quantity growth of resources to social<br />

changes involving individuals and groups, in processes that will improve quality of life and<br />

environment, marked by strong social cohesion.<br />

Regarding local economic development objectives, Parlagi (2000, in Matei, Anghelescu and<br />

Săvulescu, 2009) believes that these are represented by the economic prosperity and social welfare<br />

creating a favorable business environment, along with the integration of vulnerable groups in the<br />

community, use of endogenous resources and private sector development.<br />

Townroe (1979) has a different perspective on these objectives, arguing that they refer to the<br />

decreasing local unemployment rate at local level below its national level, reducing fluctuations in<br />

unemployment, as well as social assistance to vulnerable groups. The author believes that achieving<br />

these objectives of local economic development can be achieved by removing barriers to industrial<br />

development and economic efficiency, by active promotion and ongoing search <strong>for</strong> investors and<br />

investment opportunities, by developing different types of facilities, and also by supporting investment<br />

in industry through loans, grants, etc.<br />

Matei and Anghelescu (2009) think that the main objective of local development is the removal of<br />

barriers to the development and improvement of efficient market mechanisms. Besides this, the<br />

authors also mention the assistance <strong>for</strong> businesses, encouraging new businesses and attracting local<br />

investments.<br />

A crucial part of the well-functioning of a region’s economy is considered to be small firms since<br />

research has demonstrated the close relationship between entrepreneurship and regional and local<br />

development. This relationship has at its core innovation: innovativeness developed within local interfirm<br />

networks both supports existing firms and presents opportunities <strong>for</strong> starting new businesses in<br />

order to serve newly identified markets. Networks of firms complement and sometimes substitute <strong>for</strong> a<br />

firm's own technological capability (Maleki, 2009). <strong>Innovation</strong>, as Dawkins (2003) says, will attract<br />

investors, which in turn will attract inventors, which in turn will attract innovators. This is the way a<br />

“local innovative environment” (Wysoka, 2009) is born.<br />

The same idea is supported by Gioacchino Garofoli (2002) who considers that local productive<br />

systems, through productive linkages and interaction among local actors, produce external economies<br />

to local firms and also collective efficiency. The author also believes that the creation of dynamic<br />

competitive advantages is there<strong>for</strong>e the crucial factor <strong>for</strong> a sustainable local development.<br />

In the past decade, trade and retail grew steadily and peaked in early 2008. The growing trend of<br />

retail activity was interrupted by the economic crisis that caused a decline in its evolution, which<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!