Magdalena Jurczyk – Bunkowska described in chapter 3.1. It is worthy of note, that various authors underline the differences in search need and search strategies in relation to continuous and incremental innovation versus discontinuous and radical innovation (Laursen, 2006), (Boer, 2003). Another major finding from the observations is that enterprises are planning innovation in a <strong>for</strong>mal and in<strong>for</strong>mal way. It is not highly related to the size of the company or its organizational culture, in the contrary to primal theories. The degree of planning <strong>for</strong>malization should rather be linked with the category of innovation process and scope of the planning task, as presented in table 2. The table is the result of the detailed questions from the interviews and shows planning stages where planning area decisions are taken. To some extent the scope of the innovation process planning is consistent with the procedures which are typical <strong>for</strong> all other tasks in enterprise. The underline font indicates a partial adjustment to the area of the diagram (table 2). For example, when the company indicated that plans only a few tasks <strong>for</strong>mally. Crossing out font indicates that the company does not take planning decisions in such an area. Table 2: Scope of <strong>for</strong>mal and in<strong>for</strong>mal innovation process planning in the researched companies Planned Formal planning In<strong>for</strong>mal planning Stage of issues <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong> of <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong> of <strong>Innovation</strong> planning of current potential of new of current potential of new needs development business needs development business horizon horizon creation horizon horizon creation horizon horizon Goal of the A, C, D, A, B, C, D, A, B, C, B, F, G, G stage 1 process E, G E, F, H, I D, E, F, G, H, I H, I Time frame A, A, B, D, E, A, B, C, B, C, D, C, G stage 1, F, H, I D, E, F, E, F, G, stage 2 G, H, I H, I Scope of H B, D, E, H A, B, C, A, B, C, A, C, F, G, I stage 2 environment D, E, F, D, E, F, scanning G, H, I G, I Core team A, B, D, A, B, C, D, A, B, C, C, I stage 2 members E, F, G, H E, F, G, H, I D, E, F, G, H, I Budget D, E, A, B, C, D, A, B, C, A, F, G, G, I stage 1, E, F, H D, E, F, G, H, I H, I stage 2 Report of B, D A, B, D, E, H A, B, C, A, C, E, F, C, F, G, I F, I stage 2 results D, E, G, G, H, I (structure, method) H, Fail signals D, H A, B, C, D, A, B, C, A, B, C, F, G, I stage 3 communication E, H D, E, F, G, H, I E, F, G, I Criteria <strong>for</strong> D, H E, F, H A, B, C, A, B, C, G, I stage 2, assessing D, E, F, E, F, G, I stage 3 ideas G, H, I Key activities A, B, D, E, A, B, C, G, H, I C, F, G, I stage 2 H, D, E, F, G, H, I IN/OUT A, D, D, A, C, D, B, C, E, F, A, B, C, E, B, E, F, stage 2 in<strong>for</strong>mation of process phases H, G, H, I F, G, H, I G, I Risk D, A, C, D, A, B, C, A, B, C, E, B, E, F, stage 2 management H, I D, E, F, G, H, I F, G, H, I G, Key decisions A, D A, B, D, A, B, C, B, C, E, F, C, G, I stage 2 (moment & E, F, H D, E, F, G, H, I needed in<strong>for</strong>mation) G, H, I Level of D A, D, A, B, C, A, B, C, E, B, C, E, F, stage 2 decisions D, E, F, G, H, I F, G, H, I G, H, I 354
Ways of monitoring & control Magdalena Jurczyk – Bunkowska F A, D, F A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I A, B, C, D, E, G, H, I B, C, E, G, H, I stage 2, stage 3 Planned Formal planning In<strong>for</strong>mal planning Stage of issues <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong> of <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong> of <strong>Innovation</strong> planning of current potential of new of current potential of new needs development business needs development business horizon horizon creation horizon horizon creation horizon horizon Activities/task D, B, I A, B, C, A, B, C, D, A, C, E, F, stage 3 coordination D, E, F, G, H, I E, F, G, H, I G, H Cooperation A, D, E, F, A, B, C, D, A, B, C, B, C, G, I, I stage 2 H E, F, G, H D, E, F, G, H, I It should be mentioned that planning decisions can be made on different levels depending on the innovation process category they refer to, ex. board decides about ideas which refer to innovation of new business horizon. However, in case of innovation of current needs horizon this decision is made by the project manager. Similar situation is with innovation of potential development where project manager has to consult the board <strong>for</strong> approval. Companies have several innovation processes in progress at the same time, mostly in the category of current needs due to short-term goals. Resources are often shared by those processes, on one hand it helps the learning activity in the organization and on the other it causes the necessity to prioritize tasks. It was noticed, together with G. Moore (2007), that long-term time horizon processes are the most spectacular there<strong>for</strong>e the most favorite. It results from the board’s involvement in this category of innovation. However one should consider whether this approach is always the most reasonable. 3.4 The implication of research results <strong>for</strong> further work A gap in research on innovation process planning is connected with a problem arising from doubts whether putting innovation processes into a framework of planning will not destroy their creative nature. Some authors agree that it may unfavorably influence a final result of a process (Mum<strong>for</strong>d, 2008). The aim of the conducted research was to check whether Polish innovation succeeding companies are planning the processes. If yes, can the applied practices be more generalized so as they could become universal guidelines <strong>for</strong> planning. Basing on the interviews which enabled the analysis of several innovation processes in every company it was discovered that the processes are planned. In most cases it is due to product certification or use of external financial sources. Even if there is no such need, the innovation process is always planned. Planning of all the innovation processes also included the front-end phase, however in a different scope. There<strong>for</strong>e planning can be treated as a rule but the differences should be considered, differences referring to detailing and planning <strong>for</strong>malization scope. Further research will lead to elaborating a planning model of innovation processes, its initial assumptions are shown in the article’s chapters 3.2 and 3.3. Parallel research is being conducted over the cost estimation model of innovation process linked with the successive planning assumption. Furthermore, creation of knowledge management system is in progress, it includes the differences between innovation categories shown in the article (Jurczyk, 2011b). 4. Conclusions and discussion The aim of this article was to present main findings and effects from the research concerning innovation process planning. The genesis was to find the principles of effective innovation process management which could allow making reasonable decisions within the required time limit. The research phase presented in the article, concentrates on setting the model of innovation process planning. This tasks can be characterized by setting the aim and way to its achievement. Every researched innovation process was analyzed in this aspect despite crucial differences of <strong>for</strong>m and planning scope. The main finding of the research is the statement that innovation process management should be considered in three different categories due to the approach. However these categories are not analogous with the most popular innovation classifications which determine the level of novelty and innovation <strong>for</strong>m. <strong>Management</strong> approach results rather from managing horizon and the scope of expected innovation effects. Applying the proposed categories in managing innovation processes allows the use of proper approach to the problem and the use of supporting tools <strong>for</strong> making managing decisions. It can be exemplified by the most important decision during the planning 355
- Page 1 and 2:
Proceedings of the 7th European Con
- Page 3 and 4:
Contents Paper Title Author(s) Page
- Page 5 and 6:
Paper Title Author(s) Page No. Netw
- Page 7 and 8:
Paper Title Author(s) Page No. Impa
- Page 9 and 10:
Preface These proceedings represent
- Page 11 and 12:
UK); Erdei Gábor (University of De
- Page 13 and 14:
and innovation management and strat
- Page 15 and 16:
neering and Cost Analysis, at under
- Page 17 and 18:
Izold Guihur is a professor of mana
- Page 19 and 20:
Bala Mulloth is an assistant profes
- Page 21:
Jiro Usugami is a Professor of Mana
- Page 24 and 25:
Ioannis Akritidis and Alexandros Ka
- Page 26 and 27:
Ioannis Akritidis and Alexandros Ka
- Page 28 and 29:
Ioannis Akritidis and Alexandros Ka
- Page 30 and 31:
Service Design Systems Driven Innov
- Page 32 and 33:
Mohammed AlSudairi and TGK Vasista
- Page 34 and 35:
Mohammed AlSudairi and TGK Vasista
- Page 36 and 37:
Mohammed AlSudairi and TGK Vasista
- Page 38 and 39:
Mohammed AlSudairi and TGK Vasista
- Page 40 and 41:
Christos Apostolakis, José Carlos
- Page 42 and 43:
Christos Apostolakis, José Carlos
- Page 44 and 45:
Christos Apostolakis, José Carlos
- Page 46 and 47:
Christos Apostolakis, José Carlos
- Page 48 and 49:
Certifying Innovation: A Proposal f
- Page 50 and 51:
3. The certification of IMS Anna Ar
- Page 52 and 53:
Anna Arnò, Stefano De Falco and Gu
- Page 54 and 55:
Anna Arnò, Stefano De Falco and Gu
- Page 56 and 57:
The Main Drivers of Financial Innov
- Page 58 and 59:
Claudia Gabriela Baicu, Olimpia Sta
- Page 60 and 61:
Claudia Gabriela Baicu, Olimpia Sta
- Page 62 and 63:
Claudia Gabriela Baicu, Olimpia Sta
- Page 64 and 65:
Fernando Barbosa and Fernando Romer
- Page 66 and 67:
Fernando Barbosa and Fernando Romer
- Page 68 and 69:
Fernando Barbosa and Fernando Romer
- Page 70 and 71:
Fernando Barbosa and Fernando Romer
- Page 72 and 73:
Maria de Lurdes Calisto and Soumodi
- Page 74 and 75:
Maria de Lurdes Calisto and Soumodi
- Page 76 and 77:
Maria de Lurdes Calisto and Soumodi
- Page 78 and 79:
Maria de Lurdes Calisto and Soumodi
- Page 80 and 81:
2. Innovation Luísa Carvalho, Tere
- Page 82 and 83:
Luísa Carvalho, Teresa Costa and S
- Page 84 and 85:
Luísa Carvalho, Teresa Costa and S
- Page 86 and 87:
Luísa Carvalho, Teresa Costa and S
- Page 88 and 89:
Luísa Carvalho, Teresa Costa and S
- Page 90 and 91:
Enterprise Potential of Portuguese
- Page 92 and 93:
Maria Isabel Carvalho et al. Peterm
- Page 94 and 95:
Maria Isabel Carvalho et al. � H5
- Page 96 and 97:
Maria Isabel Carvalho et al. 325 re
- Page 98 and 99:
Maria Isabel Carvalho et al. Since
- Page 100 and 101:
Maria Isabel Carvalho et al. Lee, L
- Page 102 and 103:
Adina Catana and Lavinia Delcea the
- Page 104 and 105:
Adina Catana and Lavinia Delcea Wit
- Page 106 and 107:
Adina Catana and Lavinia Delcea Sou
- Page 108 and 109:
Adina Catana and Lavinia Delcea 2.3
- Page 110 and 111:
Adina Catana and Lavinia Delcea 201
- Page 112 and 113:
The use of Multi-Criteria Analysis
- Page 114 and 115:
Piotr Chwastyk innovation. Stage-Ga
- Page 116 and 117:
Piotr Chwastyk participation of a t
- Page 118 and 119:
Piotr Chwastyk properly conducted a
- Page 120 and 121:
Ana Cordeiro and Filipa Vieira Comp
- Page 122 and 123:
Ana Cordeiro and Filipa Vieira The
- Page 124 and 125:
Ana Cordeiro and Filipa Vieira With
- Page 126 and 127:
Ana Cordeiro and Filipa Vieira Comt
- Page 128 and 129:
Teresa Costa and Luísa Carvalho ac
- Page 130 and 131:
Teresa Costa and Luísa Carvalho or
- Page 132 and 133:
Project name Public target “Capit
- Page 134 and 135:
Teresa Costa and Luísa Carvalho Ta
- Page 136 and 137:
Appendix 1: Interview guide Referen
- Page 138 and 139:
Does it Make Sense to go Against "S
- Page 140 and 141:
Oscar Cristi, José Ernesto Amorós
- Page 142 and 143:
Oscar Cristi, José Ernesto Amorós
- Page 144 and 145:
Oscar Cristi, José Ernesto Amorós
- Page 146 and 147:
Oscar Cristi, José Ernesto Amorós
- Page 148 and 149:
Pat Daly and James Walsh organisati
- Page 150 and 151:
Pat Daly and James Walsh positive i
- Page 152 and 153:
Pat Daly and James Walsh Having int
- Page 154 and 155:
Pat Daly and James Walsh McGrath, R
- Page 156 and 157:
Luc De Grez and Dirk Van Lindt succ
- Page 158 and 159:
3.3 Method Luc De Grez and Dirk Van
- Page 160 and 161:
Luc De Grez and Dirk Van Lindt Wilc
- Page 162 and 163:
Nanotechnologies and Eco-Innovation
- Page 164 and 165:
Aurelie Delemarle and Claire Auplat
- Page 166 and 167:
Aurelie Delemarle and Claire Auplat
- Page 168 and 169:
Aurelie Delemarle and Claire Auplat
- Page 170 and 171:
Aurelie Delemarle and Claire Auplat
- Page 172 and 173:
Carine Deslee are concerned. We wil
- Page 174 and 175:
Carine Deslee Innovation. Its aim i
- Page 176 and 177:
Carine Deslee of how Participative
- Page 178 and 179:
Carine Deslee To conclude, we show
- Page 180 and 181:
Motivations and Attitudes Towards F
- Page 182 and 183:
Anca Otilia Dodescu et al. business
- Page 184 and 185:
Anca Otilia Dodescu et al. intuitio
- Page 186 and 187:
Anca Otilia Dodescu et al. funding
- Page 188 and 189:
Fostering SMEs and Innovation: Chal
- Page 190 and 191:
Anca Dodescu establishing an effici
- Page 192 and 193:
Anca Dodescu performance external t
- Page 194 and 195:
Acknowledgments Anca Dodescu The pa
- Page 196 and 197:
Entrepreneurial Capital: The Experi
- Page 198 and 199:
Thomas Domboka performance of their
- Page 200 and 201:
Thomas Domboka What seemed apparent
- Page 202 and 203:
Belonging to business Associations
- Page 204 and 205:
Thomas Domboka comparative study wi
- Page 206 and 207:
Carolyn Downs Lambros Lazuras and P
- Page 208 and 209:
Carolyn Downs Lambros Lazuras and P
- Page 210 and 211:
Carolyn Downs Lambros Lazuras and P
- Page 212 and 213:
Fostering Creativity and Innovation
- Page 214 and 215:
Claudia Erni Baumann, Frank Zoller
- Page 216 and 217:
Claudia Erni Baumann, Frank Zoller
- Page 218 and 219:
Claudia Erni Baumann, Frank Zoller
- Page 220 and 221:
Entrepreneurial Attitudes and Perce
- Page 222 and 223:
3. Methodology 3.1 Data Paula Odete
- Page 224 and 225:
Country Paula Odete Fernandes, Joã
- Page 226 and 227:
Paula Odete Fernandes, João Ferrei
- Page 228 and 229:
Paula Odete Fernandes, João Ferrei
- Page 230 and 231:
Potentialities of Public eProcureme
- Page 232 and 233:
Isabel Ferreira and Luís Alfredo A
- Page 234 and 235:
Isabel Ferreira and Luís Alfredo A
- Page 236 and 237:
Isabel Ferreira and Luís Alfredo A
- Page 238 and 239:
Isabel Ferreira and Luís Alfredo A
- Page 240 and 241:
Ana Ferreira et al. micro gas turbi
- Page 242 and 243:
Ana Ferreira et al. Figure 1: Portu
- Page 244 and 245:
3.2 Benefits of micro-CHP Ana Ferre
- Page 246 and 247:
Ana Ferreira et al. Figure 3: Growt
- Page 248 and 249:
The Influence of Innovative Capacit
- Page 250 and 251:
3. Methodology Sample and Data Joã
- Page 252 and 253:
João Ferreira, Mário Raposo and C
- Page 254 and 255:
João Ferreira, Mário Raposo and C
- Page 256 and 257:
João Ferreira, Mário Raposo and C
- Page 258 and 259:
Stelian-Cornel Florica and George D
- Page 260 and 261:
Stelian-Cornel Florica and George D
- Page 262 and 263:
Stelian-Cornel Florica and George D
- Page 264 and 265:
Stelian-Cornel Florica and George D
- Page 266 and 267:
Stelian-Cornel Florica and George D
- Page 268 and 269:
Brendan Galbraith et al. Competiven
- Page 270 and 271:
Brendan Galbraith et al. The proces
- Page 272 and 273:
References Brendan Galbraith et al.
- Page 274 and 275:
Where are They now? A Entrepreneurs
- Page 276 and 277:
Laura Galloway, Isla Kapasi and Geo
- Page 278 and 279:
Laura Galloway, Isla Kapasi and Geo
- Page 280 and 281:
6. Discussion Laura Galloway, Isla
- Page 282 and 283:
Laura Galloway, Isla Kapasi and Geo
- Page 284 and 285:
Oleg Golichenko and Svetlana Samovo
- Page 286 and 287:
Oleg Golichenko and Svetlana Samovo
- Page 288 and 289:
Oleg Golichenko and Svetlana Samovo
- Page 290 and 291:
Oleg Golichenko and Svetlana Samovo
- Page 292 and 293:
Oleg Golichenko and Svetlana Samovo
- Page 294 and 295:
Elissaveta Gourova, Ivan Draganov a
- Page 296 and 297:
Elissaveta Gourova, Ivan Draganov a
- Page 298 and 299:
Elissaveta Gourova, Ivan Draganov a
- Page 300 and 301:
Elissaveta Gourova, Ivan Draganov a
- Page 302 and 303:
Elissaveta Gourova, Ivan Draganov a
- Page 304 and 305:
Izold Guihur and Gilles Marcoux org
- Page 306 and 307:
Izold Guihur and Gilles Marcoux of
- Page 308 and 309:
Izold Guihur and Gilles Marcoux was
- Page 310 and 311:
Izold Guihur and Gilles Marcoux Par
- Page 312 and 313:
Heiko Haase, Mário Franco and Ant
- Page 314 and 315:
Heiko Haase, Mário Franco and Ant
- Page 316 and 317:
Heiko Haase, Mário Franco and Ant
- Page 318 and 319:
Heiko Haase, Mário Franco and Ant
- Page 320 and 321:
Takashi Hirao and Yusuke Hoshino We
- Page 322 and 323:
Takashi Hirao and Yusuke Hoshino As
- Page 324 and 325:
Takashi Hirao and Yusuke Hoshino 4.
- Page 326 and 327: Takashi Hirao and Yusuke Hoshino ma
- Page 328 and 329: Takashi Hirao and Yusuke Hoshino Fu
- Page 330 and 331: Jukka Huhtamäki et al. innovation
- Page 332 and 333: Jukka Huhtamäki et al. represent Y
- Page 334 and 335: Jukka Huhtamäki et al. Figure 3: T
- Page 336 and 337: Jukka Huhtamäki et al. about gatek
- Page 338 and 339: Spin-Off Performance: Entrepreneuri
- Page 340 and 341: Thanh Huynh, Daniel Aranda and Luis
- Page 342 and 343: -order CFA Measurement model Thanh
- Page 344 and 345: Thanh Huynh, Daniel Aranda and Luis
- Page 346 and 347: An Agile Approach for Measuring the
- Page 348 and 349: Monica Izvercianu and Cella-Flavia
- Page 350 and 351: Monica Izvercianu and Cella-Flavia
- Page 352 and 353: Monica Izvercianu and Cella-Flavia
- Page 354 and 355: Prosumer Involvement in Innovation
- Page 356 and 357: Monica Izvercianu and Sabina Şeran
- Page 358 and 359: Monica Izvercianu and Sabina Şeran
- Page 360 and 361: Monica Izvercianu and Sabina Şeran
- Page 362 and 363: The Competitive Advantage for Early
- Page 364 and 365: Maroun Jneid and Antoine Tannous ma
- Page 366 and 367: Maroun Jneid and Antoine Tannous Fi
- Page 368 and 369: Maroun Jneid and Antoine Tannous We
- Page 370 and 371: 7.2 Managerial contributions Maroun
- Page 372 and 373: 1.1 Innovation management Magdalena
- Page 374 and 375: esearch based on literature Areas o
- Page 378 and 379: Magdalena Jurczyk - Bunkowska stage
- Page 380 and 381: Ontologies Enable Innovation Jussi
- Page 382 and 383: Jussi Kantola and Hannu Vanharanta
- Page 384 and 385: 5. Ontology-based asymmetry Jussi K
- Page 386 and 387: Table 2: Knowledge innovation scope
- Page 388 and 389: Fusing Technology, Innovation and E
- Page 390 and 391: Panayiotis Ketikidis et al. industr
- Page 392 and 393: Panayiotis Ketikidis et al. 3.4 Pro
- Page 394 and 395: Panayiotis Ketikidis et al. dissemi
- Page 396 and 397: Panayiotis Ketikidis et al. variety
- Page 398 and 399: Developing Øresund Region’s Inno
- Page 400 and 401: 3. Methodology Peter Kiryushin, Bal
- Page 402 and 403: Peter Kiryushin, Bala Mulloth and T
- Page 404 and 405: Peter Kiryushin, Bala Mulloth and T
- Page 406 and 407: At the Intersection of Dynamic Capa
- Page 408 and 409: 3. Hypothesis development İpek Ko
- Page 410 and 411: Organizational Learning Capability
- Page 412 and 413: İpek Koçoğlu; Salih Zeki İmamo
- Page 414 and 415: İpek Koçoğlu; Salih Zeki İmamo
- Page 416 and 417: The Significance of the LGBT-Commun
- Page 418 and 419: Thomas Köllen, Regine Bendl and Sa
- Page 420 and 421: Thomas Köllen, Regine Bendl and Sa
- Page 422 and 423: Thomas Köllen, Regine Bendl and Sa
- Page 424 and 425: Thomas Köllen, Regine Bendl and Sa
- Page 426 and 427:
Crowdinvesting, an Innovative Optio
- Page 428 and 429:
Hanno Kortleben and Bernhard Vollma
- Page 430 and 431:
Hanno Kortleben and Bernhard Vollma
- Page 432 and 433:
Appendix 1 Hanno Kortleben and Bern
- Page 434 and 435:
References Hanno Kortleben and Bern
- Page 436 and 437:
2. Quality management in services Y
- Page 438 and 439:
Yvonne Lagrosen and Stefan Lagrosen
- Page 440 and 441:
Yvonne Lagrosen and Stefan Lagrosen
- Page 442 and 443:
Innovation and Entrepreneurship Stu
- Page 444 and 445:
Hans Landström, Gouya Harirchi and
- Page 446 and 447:
Hans Landström, Gouya Harirchi and
- Page 448 and 449:
Hans Landström, Gouya Harirchi and
- Page 450 and 451:
Hans Landström, Gouya Harirchi and
- Page 452 and 453:
Exploring Regulatory Focus, Entrepr
- Page 454 and 455:
Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie, Afsan
- Page 456 and 457:
Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie, Afsan
- Page 458 and 459:
Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie, Afsan
- Page 460 and 461:
The Size of an Enterprise and Enhan
- Page 462 and 463:
Ladislav Ludvík and Jindra Peterko
- Page 464 and 465:
Ladislav Ludvík and Jindra Peterko
- Page 466 and 467:
Ladislav Ludvík and Jindra Peterko
- Page 468 and 469:
Ladislav Ludvík and Jindra Peterko
- Page 470 and 471:
MariaJesus Luengo and Maria Obeso I
- Page 472 and 473:
MariaJesus Luengo and Maria Obeso O
- Page 474 and 475:
MariaJesus Luengo and Maria Obeso A
- Page 476 and 477:
MariaJesus Luengo and Maria Obeso s