30.10.2012 Views

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie, Afsaneh Bagheri and Zaidatol Haslinda Abdullah Sani<br />

efficacy was measured by using an instrument called Self-Efficacy Skills developed by Scherer et al.<br />

(1989). Finally entrepreneurial intention was measured by an instrument developed by Ajzen (1980),<br />

Krueger (2000) and Hassan (2007). The students were asked to respond on a 5 point Likert scale,<br />

anchored from 1 denoting strongly disagree to 5 strongly agree. 400 questionnaires were distributed.<br />

391 students completely filled up the questionnaire with a response rate of 97.5%. The students were<br />

from two private learning institutions in Klang Valley, Malaysia where most of the private institutions of<br />

higher education are located.<br />

4. Findings<br />

Analysis of the data shows that 242 (62%) of the respondents were male and 149 (38%) were female<br />

(Table 1). The students were from a multicultural background and different countries. About 74% of<br />

the students stated that their immediate family will support them to become an entrepreneur.<br />

Although, most of the students (76%) had no business experiences and 68% of them had never taken<br />

any entrepreneurship courses, the majority of them (71%) intend to become an entrepreneur and<br />

(81%) of them believed that students should learn entrepreneurship.<br />

Table 1: Demographic in<strong>for</strong>mation of the participants<br />

Gender F %<br />

Male 242 62<br />

Female<br />

Country<br />

149 38<br />

Malaysian 244 62<br />

International<br />

Specialization<br />

147 38<br />

Business Administration 97 26.9<br />

In<strong>for</strong>mation Technology 85 23.5<br />

Others<br />

Want to be an entrepreneur?<br />

179 49.6<br />

Yes 277 71<br />

No<br />

Support from family?<br />

114 29<br />

Yes 289 74<br />

No<br />

Students need to learn entrepreneurship?<br />

102 26<br />

Yes 315 81<br />

No<br />

Business experience<br />

76 19<br />

Yes 85 24<br />

No<br />

Had taken any entrepreneurship courses?<br />

306 76<br />

Yes 120 32<br />

No 271 68<br />

Table 2 illustrates that students scored higher on entrepreneurial skills (mean=3.48) compared to<br />

regulatory focus (mean=3.20), entrepreneurial intention (mean=3.09) and self-efficacy (3.21).<br />

Table 2: Mean scores of students’ entrepreneurial capability<br />

Study variables Cronbach’s Alpha Mean SD<br />

1. Regulatory Focus<br />

a). Promotion Pride<br />

b). Prevention Pride<br />

Entrepreneurial intention<br />

Entrepreneurial activities<br />

Social valuation<br />

.671<br />

.479<br />

.455<br />

3.20<br />

2.73<br />

3.25<br />

.855 3.09<br />

3.12<br />

3.01<br />

Self-Efficacy .814 3.21 .71<br />

Entrepreneurial Skills .864 3.48 .80<br />

Results of t-test on different constructs under this investigation based on students’ gender illustrate<br />

that scores <strong>for</strong> male students are quite higher than their female counterparts in all dimensions (Table<br />

3). Specifically, male students scored higher in regulatory focus (t=.39), promotion focus (t=.24),<br />

prevention focus (t=.63), self-efficacy (t=.96), entrepreneurial intention (t=.96), entrepreneurial<br />

activities (t=.78), social valuation (t=.86) and entrepreneurial skills (t=.25). However, the differences<br />

are not significant.<br />

433<br />

.49<br />

.46<br />

.58<br />

.52<br />

.55<br />

.57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!