30.10.2012 Views

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MariaJesus Luengo and Maria Obeso<br />

On the other hand, we identify the construct Extern sources <strong>for</strong> innovation activities. It tries to explain<br />

what were the sources of in<strong>for</strong>mation used by companies to make decisions in innovation activities<br />

and it includes four variables: (1) In<strong>for</strong>mation provided by suppliers of equipment, components or<br />

software, (2) In<strong>for</strong>mation provided by customers, (3) In<strong>for</strong>mation provided by competitors or another<br />

enterprises in the same industry and (4) In<strong>for</strong>mation provided by R+D consultants, commercial<br />

laboratories or private institutes. We have not considered control variables because the number of<br />

cases is near of the minimum, so their application would not contribute with significant in<strong>for</strong>mation.<br />

Table 1 includes a summary table with the relationships and the codes in the analysis.<br />

3.3 Research method<br />

We use Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) technique <strong>for</strong> this research. SEM technique allows<br />

studying the causal relationships between directly observable data across the proposing the type and<br />

direction of the expected relationships, and subsequent parameter estimation specifies by the<br />

relationships in the theory (Barret, 2006). As consequently, SEM is called confirmatory analysis,<br />

because its aim is confirm across the analysis of the sample the relationships (Jöreskog, 1979).<br />

We use SPSS (Statistical Package <strong>for</strong> the Social Sciences) and more specifically the AMOS<br />

application (version 19) in order to test our hypothesis. First, we check the validity of the model<br />

analyzing the normality (uni and multivariate) and reliability scale. After these checks, the analysis per<br />

se includes two phases: (1) evaluation of measure model and (2) evaluation of structural model<br />

(Barclay et al., 1995)<br />

Table 1: Summary about the relationships and the codes<br />

Construct Explanatory variable<br />

Code Description Code Description<br />

CNIN Economic impact of innovations in CNNEMPR Percentage in the total turnover due to<br />

turnover<br />

goods and services that have been<br />

introduced in the time 2008-2010 new in<br />

the enterprise<br />

CNNMERC Percentage in the total turnover due to<br />

goods and services that have been<br />

introduced in the time 2008-2010<br />

INFEX Extern sources <strong>for</strong> innovation activities INFPROV In<strong>for</strong>mation provided by suppliers of<br />

equipment, components or software<br />

INFCLIEN In<strong>for</strong>mation provided by customers<br />

INFCOOP In<strong>for</strong>mation provided by competitors or<br />

another enterprises in the same industry<br />

INFCTEC In<strong>for</strong>mation provided by R+D<br />

consultants, commercial laboratories or<br />

private institutes<br />

4. Results and interpretation<br />

4.1 Sensitivity analysis<br />

The table of descriptive statistics in<strong>for</strong>ms about the univariate normality of the data (see Table 2).<br />

Results show univariate normality of the data, with less than I3,00Iasymmetry and also less than<br />

I8,00I kurtosis in observed variables (Bollen and Long,1993). In relation to the multivariate normality,<br />

we calculate Mardia coefficient. Such as Mardia coefficient is less than p(p+2), where p is the number<br />

of observed variables in the model, we identify multivariate normality (Bollen, 1989) because the<br />

value is 23,527.<br />

We use the Cronbach alpha in order to check validity and reliability of observed variables. The results<br />

show 0,711 <strong>for</strong> variables in construct economic impact of innovations in turnover and 0,869 <strong>for</strong><br />

variables in construct extern sources <strong>for</strong> innovation activities. The minimum of the value <strong>for</strong> Cronbach<br />

alpha is 0,7, so model data is reliable and valid (Nunnally, 1978). As consequently, results show the<br />

suitability of the method of maximum likelihood estimation (ML) analysis.<br />

450

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!