30.10.2012 Views

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3. Hypothesis development<br />

İpek Koçoğlu; Salih Zeki İmamoğlu and Hüseyin İnce<br />

3.1 The relationship between OLC and innovation<br />

Several studies in the literature argue that OLC is positively related to innovation (Calantone et al<br />

2002; Hurley and Hult, 1998). Most studies consider that learning injects new ideas and strengthens<br />

the creativity and the ability to discover new opportunities, so it supports the presence of innovation<br />

(F.J. Lloréns Montes et al, 2005: 1160). Most successful innovations are the result of gradual changes<br />

in concepts and procedure implemented continually over time (Liao et al, 2008: 185). This gradual<br />

process relies on the creation, search, acquisition and sharing of knowledge which in turn will provide<br />

organizational learning and will constitute the base <strong>for</strong> the successful innovation. Although literature<br />

abounds of researches implicitly suggesting the positive leveraging power of OLC on innovation there<br />

is still a lack of empirical investigation between the two concepts (Jimenez-Jimenez and Sanz-Valle,<br />

2011). OLC is an intangible and non-transferrable resource which is firmly grounded in organizational<br />

processes (Santos-Vijande et al., 2012). OLC improves innovation per<strong>for</strong>mance through<br />

strengthening the interactions among organizational members and departments and exchange<br />

between members and artifacts such as processes and values (Alegre and Chiva, 2008). Indeed<br />

innovative outcome is achieved through clear, fast and focused communication of knowledge across<br />

internal boundaries (Goh, 2003; Baker and Sinkula, 1999) as well as its absorption from external<br />

environment (Cohen and Levinthal ,1989). For instance, as the exchange of ideas and collaborative<br />

action increases among employees the hierarchical organizational structure is shifted towards a<br />

participative decision making which increases commitment to innovate by decreasing resistance to<br />

change and allowing the risk-sharing between all related parties (Mat and Razak, 2011). As also<br />

indicated by Garcia Morales et al. (2007) "organizational learning per<strong>for</strong>ms an essential role in<br />

innovation by supporting creativity, inspiring new knowledge and ideas, and increasing the potential to<br />

understand and apply them, thus developing organizational intelligence and an innovative culture<br />

(Garcia-Morales et al., 2011). OLC encourages the establishment of a learning culture which in turn<br />

dedicates all of its members to translate knowledge and learning into innovative outputs (Hung et al,<br />

2010).Camison and Villar-Lopez (2011) refers to the employee empowerment and the use of work<br />

groups (i.e. workplace innovations) enabled through OLC. Further, product and process innovation<br />

based on a full understanding of customer needs, competitors’ actions, and technological<br />

development is made possible by organizational commitment to learn (Calantone, 2002). Firms<br />

having higher capacity to learn will be less likely to miss market opportunities since they have the<br />

necessary knowledge to anticipate and act according to the customer requirements, as well as track<br />

and understand competitors'' strengths and weaknesses better (Garcia-Morales et al., 2011).<br />

Moreover, based on the argument that innovation is achieved via the knowledge accumulation at the<br />

organizational units through exploration and exploitation, we posit that OLC facilitates innovation by<br />

balancing between the variation and selection which is equivalent to the process of balancing<br />

between exploration (i.e. generation of new alternatives) and exploitation (i.e. selection among<br />

routines) (March, 1991). For instance OLC has the potential to explore and exploit knowledge<br />

enabling the organizational members to contribute to business processes by adding value by<br />

developing and utilizing the existing and new knowledge stocks (Prieto and Revilla, 2006). This way<br />

innovation becomes the top priority in firms having high commitment to learning, and a culture based<br />

on open mindedness as well as exchange of knowledge since these are the knowledge-enhancing<br />

and innovation-driving qualities in an organization (Bolivar-Ramos et al., 2012). There<strong>for</strong>e:<br />

H1: Organizational learning capability positively influences innovation.<br />

3.2 The relationship between OLC and firm per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

Organizations that embrace strategies consistent with the learning organization are thought to<br />

achieve improved per<strong>for</strong>mance (Ellinger et al, 2002; Calantone et al, 2002). The dynamic capabilities<br />

based view of OLC emerging from the knowledge-based view offers insight on the per<strong>for</strong>mance<br />

differences of firms (Teece and Pisano, 1994). OLC is considered as a critical factor which enhances<br />

firm per<strong>for</strong>mance by many studies in the literature (Carayannis, 2006; Teece et al 1997; Argyris and<br />

Schon 1996; Slater and Narver 1995). However, studies which focus both on financial and nonfinancial<br />

measures of firm per<strong>for</strong>mance in the measurement stage of their research still lack among<br />

the literature empirically examining the relationship between OLC and firm per<strong>for</strong>mance (Prieto and<br />

Revilla, 2006) with a few exceptions such as Akgun et al (2007), as well as investigating this<br />

relationship along with the OLC-innovation link (Jimenez-Jimenez and Sanz-Valle 2011). OLC<br />

establishes a mechanism through which coordination and combination of resources and capabilities is<br />

386

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!