30.10.2012 Views

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Portuguese Social Stock Exchange – Assessment of<br />

Sustainability<br />

Teresa Costa and Luísa Carvalho<br />

Economics and <strong>Management</strong> Department, Business School, Setúbal<br />

Polytechnic Institute, Portugal<br />

teresa.costa@esce.ips.pt<br />

luisa.carvalho@esce.ips.pt<br />

Abstract: Social organizations have an important role detecting and exploring social opportunities. Frequently<br />

they are the solution to social problems where market and government fail. The social entrepreneurs identify and<br />

solve social problems where the others just see barriers, identifying and evaluating opportunities, disseminating<br />

new approaches and proposing sustainable solutions that contribute to create social value. This article, firstly<br />

presents a literature review about social entrepreneurship, social innovation and social entrepreneur, considering<br />

different approches and perspectives. Secondly, through a qualitative methodology, it is studied the projects<br />

included in Social Stock Exchange (BVS). BVS replicates the atmosphere of a stock exchange and its role is to<br />

approach civil society organizations and social investors that are available to support these organizations by<br />

purchasing their social shares. This project is developing innovative approaches to attract financial resources in<br />

order to solve social problems, including the eradication of poverty and other social risks. Through the promotion<br />

of social investment, the BVS proposes an innovative financial model supported not in a philanthropy or charity<br />

perspective, but deciding according with the social profit of each project. The empirical study based on interviews<br />

applied to key-in<strong>for</strong>mers from social projects included in BVS. The interviews have three main objectives: 1-<br />

Identify the degree of project attractiveness; 2-Understand the reasons of project attractiveness in terms of<br />

funding; 3-Assess the sustainability of the projects, concerning economic dimension (eg job creation), social<br />

dimension (eg, resolution of a social need <strong>for</strong> a vulnerable group) and environmental dimension (eg, reduction of<br />

impacts on the environment). Finally we believe that this paper contributes to a better understanding of the<br />

factors that promote the attractiveness of social projects and highlight the importance of improvement concerning<br />

management practices.<br />

Keywords: case study, social entrepreneurship, social stock exchange, social value, sustainability<br />

1. A framework of social entrepreneurship<br />

The conceptualization of social entrepreneurship, similarly to what occurs with the definition of<br />

entrepreneurship is not consesual. This is an area of knowledge that is still young, which is reflected<br />

in the variety of definitions in the literature (Seelos and Mair 2005).<br />

Another peculiarity of this approach refers to the possibility of social entrepreneurship emerge in<br />

various contexts; however, most studies refers to the public domain (Lewis, 1980; King and Roberts,<br />

1987).<br />

As Venkataraman (1997, p. 120) noted, “there are fundamentally different conceptions and<br />

interpretations of the concept of entrepreneur and the entrepreneurial role, consensus on a definition<br />

of the field in terms of the entrepreneur is perhaps an impossibility.” In this context we can identify<br />

different approaches in the literature on social entrepreneurship.<br />

To better understand social entrepreneurship, Austin et al. (2006) differentiate two types of<br />

entrepreneurship. For these authors, commercial entrepreneurship represents the identification,<br />

evaluation, and exploitation of opportunities that result in profits. In contrast, social entrepreneurship<br />

refers to the identification, evaluation, and exploitation of opportunities that result in social value.<br />

Social entrepreneurs have a sensitive understanding of social needs, and answer to these needs<br />

through creative solutions. This attention on social value is present in various definitions of social<br />

entrepreneurship (e.g., Peredo and McLean, 2006; Shaw and Carter, 2007). The main difference<br />

between these two definitions of entrepreneurship (commercial and social) is the focus on social<br />

value versus private value...<br />

Other perspectives can be found in the literature. According with Dees (1998a), social<br />

entrepreneurship refers to new non-profit ventures, as well as business ventures <strong>for</strong> social purposes,<br />

including community development banks and <strong>for</strong>-profit hybrid organizations. Austin et al. (2006, p. 2)<br />

define social entrepreneurship as “innovative, social value creating activity that can occur within or<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!