30.10.2012 Views

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

A Proposal for a Standard With Innovation Management System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Thomas Köllen, Regine Bendl and Sabine Steinbacher<br />

The online questionnaire was open from April to August 2011. 90 gay and lesbian entrepreneurs filled<br />

out at least the first two pages of the online questionnaire, and 68 of them completed it.<br />

As mentioned above, the participants of the survey (N=90) were self-employed and identified<br />

themselves as either gay (64.4%) or lesbian (35.6%). About 41.1% of the participants were running a<br />

one-man or one-woman business (sole-proprietors), and 18.9% of the firms were limited companies<br />

(GmbH). 60.3% of the entrepreneurs do not have any other incomes beside their business. 66.6% of<br />

the respondents are running their business alone, and 13.5% work together with their partner or<br />

<strong>for</strong>mer partner. Almost half of the participants were between the age of 36 and 45, 16% between 26<br />

and 35, and 28% were between 46 and 55. Only 7% of the entrepreneurs were older than 56 years.<br />

As areas of business, consulting (30%) and advertizing/marketing (23%) are predominant. 10%<br />

belong to the category of “business services” and the rest of the entrepreneurs are distributed among<br />

other sectors. The sample mainly consists of Austrians (88.2%) without any background of migration:<br />

85.3% of the respondents have an Austrian mother, 83.8% have an Austrian father, and 88.2% spent<br />

at least the major part of their school-time in Austria. The entrepreneurs have a high level of<br />

education, 61.8% have a university degree und another 19.1% have finished high school (Matura).<br />

3.2 Measures<br />

Sexual orientation: Participants were asked to identify their sexual orientation with the question: “How<br />

would you describe your sexual orientation?”, with the response choices of “lesbian/gay”, “more<br />

lesbian/more gay”, “bisexual”, and “heterosexual”. For the analysis “more lesbian/more gay” and<br />

“lesbian/gay” were taken together.<br />

Experienced discrimination (ED) in one or more <strong>for</strong>mer jobs as motivator <strong>for</strong> self-employment was<br />

assessed with the item “How important have been the following reasons <strong>for</strong> your decision to get self<br />

employed?: I got self employed because of prejudices and discriminations in my <strong>for</strong>mer job”. The fourpoint<br />

response scale ranged from 1=very important to 4= not important at all.<br />

The anticipated customers’ reactions (ACR) on finding out about the entrepreneur’s homosexuality<br />

were measured with the question “What influence does it have on your business if your customers<br />

would know (or that your customers do know) about your homosexuality? The five-point responsescale<br />

ranged from 1 = a very positive influence to 5 = a very negative influence.<br />

The commercial relatedness to the LGBT community was measured by six questions on whether<br />

special ef<strong>for</strong>ts are made to: 1. especially attract LGB customers (CR1); 2. find LGB suppliers (CR2);<br />

3. support LGB events (e.g. as sponsor) (CR3); 4. advertize the business with the fact that the owner<br />

is gay or lesbian (CR4); and 5. to find LGB investors (CR5). Participants could agree (1) or disagree<br />

(0) to these items.<br />

The commercial significance of the LGB community was assessed by three questions that asked<br />

about the extent to which the individual business success depends on: 1. the support of the LGB<br />

community (CS1); 2. the support of a LGB network (CS2); and 3. the proximity of the business to a<br />

lesbian and gay district of the city (CS3). The response scale ranged from 1 = “to a very high extent”<br />

to 4 = “not at all”.<br />

The personal relatedness to the LGB community was assessed by two items. The first item was the<br />

response to the question “How important have been the following reasons <strong>for</strong> your decision to get self<br />

employed?: I got self employed to be able to support the LGB community”. The four-point response<br />

scale ranged from 1=very important to 4= not important at all. The second item was the response to<br />

the question “What does business success mean to you personally?: To be able to support the<br />

lesbian and gay community”, that could be agreed to (1) or not (0).<br />

The importance of an assumed adequateness of the business sector choice in terms of fitting to gay<br />

or lesbian entrepreneurs was assessed by the question “Did you choose your sector of selfemployment<br />

because of it is accepted to work as gay/as a lesbian in that business area?”. The threepoint<br />

response scale was 1 = “This absolutely was my consideration”, 2 = “Up to a certain degree this<br />

was my consideration”, and 3 = “This absolutely was not my consideration”.<br />

397

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!